Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Henry Bonk Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Animals$28kEducation$13kPhilanthropy$11kFood & Nutrition$3kEnvironment$2kArts & Culture$1kHealth$500Other$0
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST HARTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$7,036
ROARING BROOK NATURE CENTER$5,000
CONSERVATION AND EDUCATION REPTILE$4,000
HINTON AREA FOUNDATION$4,000
MAINELY PETS FOUNDATION$3,000
WESTERLY LAND TRUST$2,000
CT HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
BAYPATH HUMANE SOCIETY OF HOPKINTON$1,000
CT FOODSHARE$1,000
FARMINGTON FRIENDS OF MUSIC$1,000
CCSU FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BAYPATH HUMANE SOCIETY OF HOPKINTON: $1k → 8%BEARDSLEY ZOO: $1k → 9%CCSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%CT FOODSHARE: $1k → 12%WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $2k → 7%WALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 13%HINTON AREA FOUNDATION: $5k → 23%MAINELY PETS FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%FOODSHARE: $2k → 11%HINTON AREA FOUNDATION: $4k → 23%THE MCAULEY: $1k → 11%HINTON AREA FOUNDATION: $2k → 23%WEST HARTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $7k → 11%CONSERVATION AND EDUCATION REPTILE: $4k → 11%FHS MUSIC DEPARTMENT: $5k → 11%CT HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 11%FARMINGTON FRIENDS OF MUSIC: $1k → 11%RIVERSIDE REPTILES: $1k → 11%ROARING BROOK NATURE CENTER: $12k → 11%ROARING BROOK NATURE CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
2
Connecticut Votes for Animals Inc

CT Votes for Animals (CVA) is a state-wide, grass-roots animal advocacy organization dedicated to improving the lives of CTs animals by championing legislative change. CVA effects policy change by mobilizing animal supporters in…

Animals
3
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
4
Farmington Land Trust

The Farmington Land Trust Inc protects open space in the town of Farmington CT through the acquisition of open space, stewardship of acquired land, education of the public about the importance of open space and advocacy that ensures…

Environment
5
The Humane Society of Harford County Inc

The humane society of harford county's mission is to promote the humane treatment of homeless, stray and abandoned animals by providing shelter, care, adoptions and community education.

Animals
6
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
7
Central Aroostook Humane Society

Shelter and care for abandoned pets

Animals
8
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
9
Friends of Camden Animal Shelter

To rescue and shelter abandoned and unwanted animals until they can be found permanent safe and caring homes.

Animals
10
Warwick Valley Humane Society Inc

Operation of Animal Shelter

Animals
11
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
12
Central Vermont Humane Society Inc

To educate the public in the prevention of cruelty to animals and provide shelter and medical care for homeless animals as well as assist in finding permanent homes for these animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Mainely Pets Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROARING BROOK NATURE CENTER: $16,500 · OtherROARING BROOK NATURE CENTERWEST HARTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $7,036 · OtherWEST HARTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLSIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherWALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLCONSERVATION AND EDUCATION REPTILE: $4,000 · OtherCONSERVATION AND EDUCATION REPTILETHE WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $2,000 · OtherFOODSHARE INC: $2,000 · Other+6 more: $5,500 · Other+6 moreHINTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · PhilanthropyHINTON AREA FOUNDAT…THE FARMINGTON COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $500 · PhilanthropyMAINELY PETS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · AnimalsMAINELY PE…CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 · AnimalsCONNECTICU…BAYPATH HUMANE SOCIETY OF HOPKINTON INC: $1,000 · AnimalsBAYPATH HU…THE CCSU FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Education
Other$47,036Philanthropy$11,000Animals$6,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHINTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMAINELY PETS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOODSHARE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CCSU FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYPATH HUMANE SOCIETY OF HOPKINTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FARMINGTON COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HINTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINELY PETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTERLY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CCSU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYPATH HUMANE SOCIETY OF HOPKINTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FARMINGTON COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Henry Bonk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Henry Bonk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Ccsu Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry Bonk’s filings →

More from the funding graph