Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Helping Hands Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0157% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$236kHealth$48kEducation$38kInternational$5kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kFood & Nutrition$4kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
$9,600
Median grant
3
States reached
$369k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
Individual grant recipient$13,200
Individual grant recipient$11,900
Cong Achiezer KY$11,400
Various$9,800
Global Center of Skver$9,600
Mechon Lhoyroa$7,200
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Cong Vien Bnos Chana$4,320
Talmud Torah Darkei Avos$3,600
Skver Matzah Shmura$2,277
Cong Bais Shmiel Tzvi$1,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YESHIVA D'MONSEY: $18k → 14%Cong Achiezer KY: $11k → 14%Khal Kedishas Levi: $7k → 15%CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 10%Talmud Torah Darkei Avos: $14k → 14%Khal Kedishas Levi: $6k → 15%MECHON LHOYROA: $14k → 14%Cong Miskanos Yakov: $12k → 14%Mechon Lhoyroa: $11k → 14%Cong Ahavas Achim: $20k → 7%YESHIVA D'MONSEY: $11k → 14%Talmud Torah Darkei Avos: $9k → 14%Talmud Torah Darkei Avos: $9k → 14%Talmud Torah Darkei Avos: $7k → 14%CONG VIEN BNOS CHANA: $7k → 14%YESHIVA D'MONSEY: $7k → 14%YESHIVA D'MONSEY: $7k → 14%Talmud Torah Darkei Avos: $7k → 14%Talmud Torah Darkei Avos: $7k → 14%Mechon Lhoyroa: $7k → 14%Kupath Ezra: $6k → 14%CONG ZEMACH DAVID: $5k → 14%Cong Miskanos Yakov: $5k → 14%FREIDOM: $20k → 14%YAFFED: $15k → 14%YAFFED: $15k → 14%OTD MEETUP: $10k → 14%FREIDOM: $9k → 14%KINDEAR INC: $8k → 14%KINDEAR INC: $5k → 14%YAFFED: $5k → 14%MIFAL KUPATH CHASANIM: $22k → 14%Cong Chasidei Zvhill: $16k → 14%Yeshiva Avir Yakov: $13k → 14%MIFAL KUPATH CHASANIM: $13k → 14%BAIS YAKOV YOSEF: $10k → 14%Various: $10k → 14%Global Center of Skver: $10k → 14%CHESED 247: $9k → 14%MIFAL KUPATH CHASANIM: $7k → 14%MIFAL KUPATH CHASANIM: $7k → 14%CONG MISKANOS YAKOV: $7k → 14%KEHAL KEDISHES LEVY: $7k → 14%KEHAL KEDISHES LEVY: $6k → 14%CONG MISKANOS YAKOV: $6k → 14%Bnei Yakov Yosef: $5k → 14%BNEI YAKOV YOSEF: $5k → 14%Bnei Yakov Yosef: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$473k · 28 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +155% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
34

Total granted

$473k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+155%
+15%

Still filing today

11%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YI
    YAFFED INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $38k · revenue +155%
  • SO
    SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247
    7× · 2017–2023 · $19k · revenue +324%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSIONgraduated
    3× · 2020–2022 · $5k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
4
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
5
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
6
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
7
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
8
Nefesh Chaim Inc
Religion
9
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
10
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
11
Chabad On Campus International Inc

Our vision is to champion robust jewish life and learning on college campuses around the world. together with chabad house directors, we seek a future where every jewish student has a deeper affinity, connection and understanding of their…

Religion
12
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chai Lifeline Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TALMUD TORAH DARKEI AVOS - MONSEY: $57,600 · OtherTALMUD TORAH DARKEI AVOS - MONSEYIndividual grant recipient: $49,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA DMONSEY: $48,000 · OtherYESHIVA DMONSEYMECHON LHOROA: $32,400 · OtherMECHON LHOROAFREIDOM INC: $30,800 · OtherFREIDOM INCIndividual grant recipient: $29,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherCONG VIEN BNOS CHANA: $18,720 · Other+47 more: $240,243 · Other+47 moreYAFFED INC: $37,650 · EducationSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $18,600 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $3,755 · Food & NutritionCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 · HealthYOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC: $3,520 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,100 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,955 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $3,515 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,800 · InternationalGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $3,430 · Human ServicesCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,250 · Public BenefitMIKVAH USA INC: $960 · Religion
Other$546,763Education$37,650Food & Nutrition$22,355Health$9,620International$9,270Human Services$3,430Public Benefit$1,250Religion$960

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAFFED INC: $37,650 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $18,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,955 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $3,755 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC: $3,520 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $3,515 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $3,430 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $960 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAFFED INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY28.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Ani Mamin Foundation · The Pillars Trust · Lodz Charitable Trust · Mk Charity Foundation Inc · The H y K Foundation · The Gds Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Vyazreim Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Helping Hands Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Helping Hands Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helping Hands’ filings →

More from the funding graph