Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Heiser Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$452k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$738kYouth Development$382kHealth$105kEducation$76kAnimals$75kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $358k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
GRATITUDE AMERICA$150,000
BAK K-9 TRAINING$57,500
Individual grant recipient$30,000
FLAGLER COUNTY EDUCATION FUND$10,100
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$8,000
SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ARTS$7,000
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$7,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$6,000
COLUMBIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA$5,000
TEXAS A&M$5,000
THOMAS UNIVERSITY$5,000
BRAVE AID$5,000
WINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA: $130k → 8%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA: $80k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 12 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$1.8M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+8%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $210k · revenue +159%
  • TI
    Teens-In-Flight Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $192k · revenue +286% · 58% of their budget
  • FI
    FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • PC
    PALM COAST ARTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -99%
  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity College

To expand on the mission statement made on page 1, trinity's core mission values and characteristics emphasize: 1)commitment to the education of women in a particular way through the design and pedagogy of the historic undergraduate…

Education
2
Saint Augustine's University

The mission of the University is to prepare students personally, socially, and intellectually to effectively function in a global and technological society.

Education
3
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
4
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Capitol Technology University

To provide practical education in engineering, computer science, information technology and business that prepares individuals for professional careers and affords them the opportunity to thrive in a changing world.

Education
8
Trinity College

Trinity college's mission is to provide excellence in liberal arts education with emphasis on outstanding faculty, rigorous curriculum, talented and motivated student body and an attractive, supportive and secure campus community.

Education
9
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
12
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Institute of Technology Inc; the most unlike its peers is Palm Coast Arts Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $340,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAK K-9 TRAINING: $132,500 · OtherBAK K-9 TRAININGSTUART F MEYER FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherSTUART F MEYER FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFLAGLER COUNTY EDUCATION FUND: $30,300 · Other+11 more: $87,500 · Other+11 moreGRATITUDEAMERICA INC: $640,750 · Public BenefitGRATITUDEAMERICA INCSERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesSERVICE DOGS…Teens-In-Flight Inc: $192,400 · Youth DevelopmentTeens-In-Fl…FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $18,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 · EducationTHOMAS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationWINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$750,300Public Benefit$640,750Human Services$210,000Youth Development$192,400Education$39,000Recreation & Sports$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRATITUDEAMERICA INC: $640,750 over 3y, 17% of budgetSERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $210,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetTeens-In-Flight Inc: $192,400 over 5y, 58% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALM COAST ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRATITUDEAMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Teens-In-Flight Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PALM COAST ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Heiser Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Heiser Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Heiser Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Heiser Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heiser’s filings →

More from the funding graph