Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hehl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$29kAnimals$17kHuman Services$11kHealth$9kFood & Nutrition$4kScience & Tech$2kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
8
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICH HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOS$800
WITTENBURG UNIVERSITY$750
ALBION COLLEGE$750
MARIAN HIGH SCHOOL$750
Individual grant recipient$750
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$500
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$400
LIGHTHOUSE NORTH$400
BOYS TOWN$300
Individual grant recipient$250
THE FISTULA FOUNDATION$150
ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL$150
ALASKA RAPTOR CTR$150
ASPCA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $400 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $400 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $400 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $400 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
WI
MI
NY
SD
OH
CA
NE
AZ
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 20 repeat orgs$660 to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$68k
$660

Still filing today

35%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +90%
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +29%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • GM
    GENERAL MOTORS HERITAGE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $400
  • NO
    NORTH OAKLAND HEADWATERS LAND CONS
    one grant, 2019 · $50
  • OT
    OAKLAND TOWN HALL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
Animal Rescue League of Boston

The animal rescue league of boston's vision is to confront animal cruelty and neglect at its root causes. through programs, services, and facilities focused on accessible animal care, public advocacy, and sustained anti-cruelty efforts...…

Animals
3
Alley Cat Rescue Inc

ACRs programs promote better care for community cats through trap-neuter-return. Local programs include placing unwanted cats in new homes, running a low-cost spay/neuter clinic, and providing support for local feral cat caretakers.…

Animals
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals
7
The Animal Medical Center

Dedicated to providing compassionate and collaborative care to animals and to leading the advancement of veterinary medicine through innovative clinical research and education.

Animals
8
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
9
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
10
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
11
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
12
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICH HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,290 · OtherMICH HUMANE SOCIETYWITTENBURG UNIVERSITY: $6,750 · OtherWITTENBURG UNIVERSITYMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $6,750 · OtherMARIAN HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $6,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOS: $5,900 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSLIGHTHOUSE NORTH: $3,500 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE NORTHSALVATION ARMY: $2,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,250 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,200 · Other+14 more: $5,215 · Other+14 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,700 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2,600 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS …Father Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,200 · Human ServicesFather Flana…ALBION COLLEGE: $6,750 · EducationALBION COL…ALASKA RAPTOR REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,350 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $400 · AnimalsThe Fistula Foundation: $1,350 · Health
Other$56,905Human Services$8,500Education$6,750Animals$1,750Health$1,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALBION COLLEGE: $6,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA RAPTOR REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $1,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA RAPTOR REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hehl Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hehl Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hehl Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph