Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Haugh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$101kHuman Services$92kAnimals$89kHousing & Shelter$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$34kYouth Development$20kInternational$12kFood & Nutrition$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH$12,500
MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN$8,000
COMMUNITY HOME REPAIR PROJECTS$5,000
SISTER JOSE WOMEN'S CENTER$5,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$4,000
CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHAB SVCS$4,000
TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS$3,500
PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION$3,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,500
EL RIO HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS$2,000
BEACON GROUP$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SO ARIZONA$2,000
MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $1k → 11%Casa Esperanza Para Ninos: $2k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 11%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $8k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $4k → 15%BEACON GROUP: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $4k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%Youth on Their Own: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$377k · 16 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$377k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+12%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWN
    7× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +138%
  • TP
    The Primavera Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +54%
  • TM
    THE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • AR
    American Red Cross
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • HS
    Humane Society of Southern Arizonagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +46%
  • SA
    San Agnacio Yaquyi Council
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
3
Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum
—
4
The Dons of Arizona
Education
5
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
6
Ajo Community Health Center

The vision of desert senita community health center states: your center for healing and wellness. the mission is quality, local, affordable healthcare for all. desert senita community health center is the sole provider of primary medical,…

Health
7
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
8
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
9
Sunshine Rescue Mission

Since 1957, SRM has provided safe emergency shelter, meals, and clothing to anyone in need. All participants are experiencing homelessness and living below the federal poverty line at intake. Located in Flagstaff, we have three facilities.…

Religion
10
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

—
11
Tucson Investigative Reporting Center Inc

The Tucson Investigative Reporting Center educates and informs Southern Arizonans about the community challenges & unique culture of our borderlands through independent local journalism.

Animals
12
Canyonlands Community Health Center

The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Community Services; the most unlike its peers is Marshall Home for Men Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $109,500 · OtherCHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCHHUMANE SOCIETY OF SO ARIZONA: $30,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF SO ARIZONAAMERICAN RED CROSS OF SO ARIZONA: $29,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS OF SO ARIZONABIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $20,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSBLESSINGS FROM THE HEART INC: $12,250 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC: $9,000 · Other+15 more: $38,250 · Other+15 moreYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR O…Casa Esperanza Para Ninos: $18,500 · Human ServicesCasa Esperanza P…Marshall Home for Men INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesMarshall Home fo…+2 more: $4,000 · Human Services+2 moreTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $27,000 · AnimalsTucson Wildlife…THE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION: $24,500 · AnimalsTHE MARY C SCHA…Humane Society of Southern Arizona: $5,000 · AnimalsHumane Society …Equine Voices Rescue & Sanctuary: $2,000 · AnimalsThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $29,500 · Housing & ShelterThe Prima…Sister Jose Women's Center: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterSister Jo…MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $5,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES: $4,000 · HealthTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $6,500 · Environment
Other$248,000Human Services$64,500Animals$58,500Housing & Shelter$34,500Food & Nutrition$12,000Health$9,000Environment$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $30,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $29,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $27,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION: $24,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCasa Esperanza Para Ninos: $18,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMarshall Home for Men INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUBBELL TRADING POST: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBEACON GROUP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEquine Voices Rescue & Sanctuary: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds The Primavera Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Casa Esperanza Para Ninos ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds Marshall Home for Men INC ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds Southern Arizona AIDS Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HUBBELL TRADING POST ↗
  • Who funds BEACON GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Equine Voices Rescue & Sanctuary ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ36× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The Kai Family Foundation · The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Intuit Foundation · Elizabeth Read Taylor Foundation · Ashton Family Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Marshall Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haugh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haugh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Haugh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Haugh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haugh’s filings →

More from the funding graph