· Private foundation
The Harvey Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $151k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,000 |
| UNION CHURCH OF SAN JUAN | $15,000 |
| ROBINSON SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| HOGAR NSTRA SRA DE LA PROVIDENCIA | $15,000 |
| ESCAPE | $10,000 |
| PUERTO RICO TENNIS ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| HOSPITAL DEL NINO | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| PROYECTOS ALEGRIA | $10,000 |
| SAN JUAN COMMUNITY LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| FUNDACION PEDIATRICA DE DIABETES | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,000 |
| BOSTON COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RSRobinson School Inc Robinson School inc5× · 2020–2024 · $79k · revenue +47%
- FPFUNDACION PEDIATRICA DE DIABETES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +6%
- PIPATHWAYS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- SUSECOND UNION CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Medical asst to under develop areas
Increase postsecondary enrollment and completion of students from low income communities with the highest postsecondary non-enrollment.
The University of Puerto Rico Foundation is a non-partisan non-profit organization thatfacilitates philanthrophic contributions and support to benefit the University of Puerto Ricosystems campuses students and faculty.
The universidad del sagrado corazon (sagrado) is an independent, nonprofit, catholic university, committed to the education of the whole person through strong foundation in the liberal arts. sagrado is part of puerto ricos oldest private,…
To be the principal medical education institution of the university of puerto rico and to offer health care services to the residents of puerto rico.
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
The university accomplished their mission trough a dynamic educational experience, critical and creative, surrounded by christian friendship and committed to find the answers and solutions to the challenge of the culture, the caribbean,…
The universidad interamericana de puerto rico inc, is a higher education institution pursuing quality thru academic excellence with emphasis in the formation of people with higher standards, ethical and democratically values.
To improve the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities in puerto rico, through specialized in housing, health, education, and special care on a dignified, safe and loving environment.
Provide scholarships to needy children in Dominican Republic
Caras of the Americas was formed to promote international collaboration and exchange among all people of the Western Hemisphere; to promote grassroots development; to contribute to the improved provision of the education and health…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fundacion Pediatrica De Diabetes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Proyectos Alegria Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Robinson School Inc Robinson School inc ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION PEDIATRICA DE DIABETES INC ↗
- Who funds PROYECTOS ALEGRIA INC ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION ONCOLOGICA HIMA-SAN PABLO INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIEDAD PRO HOSPITAL DEL NINO ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNA-USA PR CHAPTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Harvey Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Harvey Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Harvey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.