Loading…
· Private foundation
THE HARVEY & ELIZABETH PRIOR SHRIBER
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$106k
Granted FY2024
34
Grants
1
Communities
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of THE HARVEY & ELIZABETH PRIOR SHRIBER’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 34 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
$1,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Binghamton University Foundation$13,000
- Community Foundation$12,000
- Jewish Community Center$11,000
- Catholic Charities$10,000
- Association for Vision Rehabilitati$8,000
- Humane Society$6,000
- BCC Foundation$5,000
- Project Paw$3,600
- WSKG$3,000
- Binghamton City Schools$3,000
- Hamilton College Alumni Fund$2,500
- Guiding Eyes for the Blind$2,500
- Broome County Dog Shelter$2,500
- Habitat for Humanity$2,000
- Kilmer Mansion Restoration Pres$2,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$873k · 42 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else
42 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
42
5
Total granted
$873k
$16k
Still filing today
24%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GEGuiding Eyes for the Blind8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +72%
- BPBinghamton Philharmonic8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +20%
- GTGoodwill Theatre8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- BUBINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY FOUND HISTORYone grant, 2017 · $9k
- BUBINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP Fone grant, 2017 · $3k
- TJTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF BINGHAMTONone grant, 2017 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Le Moyne College
The college is a diverse learning community that strives for academic excellence in the catholic and jesuit tradition through comprehensive programs.
Education
2
Seneca Falls Performing Arts Center
Arts & Culture
3
The Shakespeare Theatre
Shakespeare theatre company creates world-class (see schedule o for continuation)
Arts & Culture
4
The Saratoga Hospital
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
Health
5
The William W Backus Hospital
The William W. Backus Hospital delivers and coordinates a continuum of high-quality health care that is sensitive to the needs of individuals in Eastern Connecticut. The Hospital is committed to being responsive and accountable to those…
Health
6
The Danbury Hospital
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
Health
7
Maimonides Medical Center
Maimonides medical center is dedicated to fostering healthy communities. we provide high quality, compassionate patient care and comprehensive community services. as a premier academic medical center, we are devoted to educating health…
Health
8
Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home
To improve the health and well-being of people through high-qualty, cost-effective healthcare in the home and community.
Health
9
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital
To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities.
Health
10
The Jewish Community Center
The jewish community center of greater columbus (jcc) is a nonprofit human service agency offering a varied program that is jewish in nature. it is committed to enhancing the quality of individual and family life through the promotion of…
—
11
St John's University New York
St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education.
Education
12
White Plains Hospital Medical Center
To offer high quality, acute health care and preventive medical care to all people who live in, work in, or visit westchester county and its surrounding areas.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Family & Children's Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is The College of Saint Rose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$623,800Housing & Shelter$109,000Human Services$98,000Arts & Culture$21,500Health$19,500Education$17,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Jim and Joan Walsh FoundationNY16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Jim and Joan Walsh Foundation · Jacob & Rose Olum Foundation · The Victor& Esther Rozen Foundation Inc · Bgm Foundation · Raymond Foundation · Ruthanne Koffman Charitable Foundation · Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker · Tioga Downs Regional Community · Ibm International Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE HARVEY & ELIZABETH PRIOR SHRIBER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Ti Ahwaga Community Players Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 222364159 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Ti Ahwaga Community Players Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber?
Find your warmest path to The Harvey & Elizabeth Prior Shriber through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines