Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
62
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$1.7MInternational$1.5MCivil Rights$1.1MEducation$1.0MPublic Benefit$803kSocial Science$727kHealth$365kArts & Culture$335kOther$0
02FY2024 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $959k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$22,197
Median grant
19
States reached
$74M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$125,000
JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE$50,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$45,000
CLARK UNIVERSITY$44,950
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$44,818
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$44,515
TEACHERS COLLEGE$40,000
TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$39,791
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$39,000
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY$37,761
Individual grant recipient$37,500
UNIVERSITY OF KENT$37,071
UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC IN MONTREAL$36,896
Individual grant recipient$35,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 77% of grant dollars ($6.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($1.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION: $1k → 9%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION: $1k → 9%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $2k → 12%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $600 → 8%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $600 → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 23% of all-years giving ($1.9M)

24 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$538k · 16 grants
Canada$352k · 11 grants
Uganda$185k · 14 grants
Israel$169k · 5 grants
Italy$109k · 3 grants
Chile$95k · 3 grants
France$75k · 3 grants
Brazil$55k · 2 grants
Tunisia$46k · 1 grant
Netherlands$45k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 37% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 170 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

170 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 139 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

170
292

Total granted

$3.2M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+33%

Still filing today

53%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $711k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +43%
  • TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +4%
  • Northwestern University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $108k
  • JJ
    JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTIC
    one grant, 2019 · $106k
  • PM
    PROF MAHMOOD MAMDANI MAKERERE INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL RESEARCH
    one grant, 2017 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
10
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is South Royalton Senior Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

173 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 173 of the 496 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
169/173
Grantees still filing
129/173
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE: $480,651 · OtherJOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE+184 more: $6,551,427 · Other+184 moreTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $89,826 · EducationTeachers College Columbia University: $40,000 · EducationNew York University: $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $21,500 · EducationBERKELEY HEIGHTS PARENT TEACHER WILLIAM WOODRUFF SCHOOL PTO: $20,000 · EducationGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC: $16,500 · EducationCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $194,564 · InternationalSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $40,000 · PhilanthropyCouncil on Foundations Inc: $26,200 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University: $50,800 · Recreation & SportsCOUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC: $34,041 · Crime & LegalJUVENILE LAW CENTER: $15,800 · Crime & Legal
Other$7,032,078Education$242,826International$194,564Arts & Culture$120,000Philanthropy$81,200Recreation & Sports$50,800Crime & Legal$49,841

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $194,564 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $89,826 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $50,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC: $34,041 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNew York University: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $26,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP IGREJA CRISTA EVANGELICA INC: $24,904 over 1y, 71% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $21,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC: $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Princeton Area Community Foundation IncNJ23.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Vermont Community Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Windham Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Vermont Council on the Arts Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Page & Otto Marx Jr Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 370%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • High Spirit Community Farm Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Catamount Film & Arts Company: 27% of income from government
  • Vermont Council On the Arts Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Sarasa Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Narrows Center for the Arts Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Vital Communities Inc: 5% of income from government
  • White River Partnership Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • St Johnsbury Athenaeum Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Revelsinc: 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Bruce Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Lighthouse Artcenter Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability: 0% of income from government
  • High Watch Recovery Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
37get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 496 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry Frank Guggenheim’s filings →

More from the funding graph