Skip to content
The Harold D & Hazel H Hathcoat Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Harold D & Hazel H Hathcoat Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$77kEducation$55kReligion$31kMembership Benefit$27kHuman Services$16kCommunity Improvement$16kYouth Development$14kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOWATA SUNSET MASONIC LODGE #57$7,500
COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE & DEVELOPMENT INC$6,000
NOWATA MINSTERIAL ALLIANCE$5,000
10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM$5,000
NOWATA CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY$5,000
LIVING WORD CHURCH$4,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA$4,000
DELAWARE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,500
WANN COMMUNITY CENTER$3,500
WANN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,500
TOWN OF DELAWARE$3,500
SOUTH COFFEYVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,500
DIAMOND POINT PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION$3,500
ALLUWE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,500
ALLUWE COMMUNITY CENTER$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALLUWE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 10%NOWATA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11k → 16%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $25k → 19%ALLUWE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 10%NOWATA SUNSET MASONIC LODGE #57: $8k → 16%SEE LIST ATTACHED: $24k → 19%ALLUWE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 10%NOWATA SUNSET MASONIC LODGE #57: $7k → 16%SEE LIST ATTACHED: $24k → 19%ALLUWE COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 10%NOWATA SUNSET MASONIC LODGE #57: $7k → 16%10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM: $5k → 16%NOWATA MINSTERIAL ALLIANCE: $5k → 16%NOWATA MINSTERIAL ALLIANCE: $5k → 16%NOWATA CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY: $5k → 16%NOWATA CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY: $5k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $4k → 16%LIVING WORD CHURCH: $4k → 16%NOWATA MINSTERIAL ALLIANCE: $4k → 16%Nowata Sunset Masonic: $4k → 16%NOWATA SUNSET MASONIC LODGE #57: $4k → 16%NOWATA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 16%Nowata Sunset Masonic: $4k → 16%NOWATA CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY: $4k → 16%DIAMOND POINT PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $4k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $3k → 16%10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM: $3k → 16%Nowata Ministerial Alliance: $3k → 16%LIVING WORD CHURCH: $3k → 16%Nowata Ministerial Alliance: $3k → 16%NOWATA MINSTERIAL ALLIANCE: $3k → 16%10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM: $3k → 16%NOWATA CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY: $3k → 16%DIAMOND POINT PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $3k → 16%Nowata City County Library: $3k → 16%Nowata City County Library: $3k → 16%NOWATA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 16%SOUTH COFFEYVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11k → 16%OKLAHOMA UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11k → 16%SOUTH COFFEYVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 16%SOUTH COFFEYVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 16%WANN COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 16%WANN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 16%WANN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 16%WANN COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 16%LENAPAH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 16%DELAWARE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 16%TOWN OF DELAWARE: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$244k · 35 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
5

Total granted

$244k
$35k

Still filing today

11%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NOWATA CITY COUNTY LIBRARY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +115%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +15%
  • 1E
    10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • OU
    OKLAHOMA UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • SC
    SOUTH COFFEYVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • NP
    NOWATA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOWATA SUNSET MASONIC LODGE #57: $25,000 · OtherNOWATA SUNSET MASONIC LODGE #57NOWATA MINSTERIAL ALLIANCE: $17,000 · OtherNOWATA MINSTERIAL ALLIANCECOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN: $16,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENOKLAHOMA UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11,000 · OtherSOUTH COFFEYVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11,000 · OtherNOWATA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11,000 · OtherWANN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8,500 · OtherLENAPAH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8,500 · OtherDELAWARE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8,500 · OtherSOUTH COFFEYVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8,500 · OtherDIAMOND POINT PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $8,500 · OtherALLUWE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8,500 · OtherWANN COMMUNITY CENTER: $8,400 · OtherTOWN OF DELAWARE: $8,400 · OtherALLUWE COMMUNITY CENTER: $7,800 · Other+21 more: $53,825 · Other+21 moreNOWATA CITY COUNTY LIBRARY: $21,000 · Education10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM: $13,500 · HealthFAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC INC: $6,500 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $9,500 · Youth DevelopmentNOWATA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $8,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$220,425Education$21,000Health$20,000Youth Development$9,500Public Safety & Disaster$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNOWATA CITY COUNTY LIBRARY: $21,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM: $13,500 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $9,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNOWATA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $8,500 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NOWATA CITY COUNTY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMEN ↗
  • Who funds 10-33 EMERGENCY C B TEAM ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA ↗
  • Who funds NOWATA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harold D & Hazel H Hathcoat Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harold D & Hazel H Hathcoat Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 62%
  • Community Action Resource and Developmen: 62% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harold D & Hazel H Hathcoat Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Harold D & Hazel H Hathcoat Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold D & Hazel H Hathcoat’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home