Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hardoon Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$400
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$18kInternational$2kPhilanthropy$1kPublic Benefit$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$700Human Services$300Education$100Animals$50Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
7
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDRENS$400
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$300
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$300
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOC OF FLORIDA$300
AMERICAN HEART ASSOC$300
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$200
MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH$200
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$200
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$200
USO$200
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$200
CHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM$100
GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN'S FUND$100
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH$100
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LEV LALEV FUND: $300 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $300 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 13%USO: $200 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $500 → 17%CHILDRENS MIRACLE HOSPITALS: $300 → 8%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $300 → 7%MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH: $200 → 8%LEV LALEV FUND: $300 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $300 → 14%USO: $300 → 14%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION: $200 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $500 → 17%CHILDRENS MIRACLE HOSPITALS: $200 → 8%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $200 → 7%MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH: $200 → 8%LEV LALEV FUND: $300 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $300 → 14%USO: $200 → 14%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION: $200 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $400 → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $200 → 7%MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH: $200 → 8%LEV LALEV FUND: $250 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $300 → 14%USO: $200 → 14%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION: $200 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $350 → 17%LEV LALEV FUND: $200 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $200 → 14%USO: $200 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $350 → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $200 → 14%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $200 → 13%KEREN YESOMIM: $360 → 13%USO: $200 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $350 → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $200 → 14%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $200 → 13%USO: $200 → 14%NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $300 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $350 → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $200 → 14%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $200 → 13%NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $300 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $300 → 17%ST JUDE CHILDRENS: $300 → 17%VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $300 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 25 repeat orgs$660 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -4% since the first grant, against -51% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$24k
$560

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
-51%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +145%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +33%
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $850 · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $360
  • TH
    Tzohar Halev Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $100 · revenue -51%
  • HA
    HARAV ARYEH MALKEIL KOTLER
    one grant, 2022 · $50
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
11
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is General Israel Orphan Home for Girls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN LUNG ASSOC OF FLORIDA: $2,200 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOC OF FLORIDAUSO: $1,500 · OtherUSOLEV LALEV FUND: $1,350 · OtherLEV LALEV FUNDVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $1,350 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $1,250 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $1,150 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYCHILDRENS MIRACLE HOSPITALS: $1,050 · OtherCHILDRENS MIRACLE HOSPITALSARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $900 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATIONALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION: $700 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 · OtherMACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH: $700 · OtherNICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $600 · OtherGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN'S FUND: $500 · Other+5 more: $860 · Other+5 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,400 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL IN…American Heart Association Inc: $2,100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,100 · HealthAmerican Diabetes AssociationPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $850 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INCMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $350 · Health+2 more: $400 · HealthCHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC: $800 · InternationalGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS: $300 · InternationalPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $350 · PhilanthropyTzohar Halev Inc: $100 · Education
Other$14,810Health$8,700International$1,100Philanthropy$350Education$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC: $800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTzohar Halev Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Tzohar Halev Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hardoon Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hardoon Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hardoon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph