Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hardison Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$450k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$70k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Hardison Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Hardison Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $450k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
17
8
18
10
19
12
20
11
21
11
22
11
23
11
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$11MFood & Nutrition$1.2MHealth$830kInternational$560kEducation$485kHuman Services$260kReligion$120kAnimals$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $270k
$45,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$70,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$50,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$50,000
ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$50,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S$50,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$45,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$45,000
OREGON FOOD BANK$20,000
ECHO INC$20,000
NORTH COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION$10,000
PEO INTERNATIONAL$10,000
COTTEY COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 21%OREGON FOOD BANK: $20k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 17%BLESSINGS IN THE STORM: $20k → 10%NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $45k → 8%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 21%OREGON FOOD BANK: $20k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S: $50k → 17%BLESSINGS IN THE STORM: $20k → 10%NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $45k → 8%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%OREGON FOOD BANK: $20k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $45k → 8%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%OREGON FOOD BANK: $20k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S: $50k → 17%NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $45k → 8%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $45k → 8%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45k → 13%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $75k → 14%HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $70k → 11%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $75k → 14%HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50k → 14%HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50k → 14%HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50k → 14%HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OR
SD
IA
OH
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 20 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -22% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down. Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$3.5M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-22%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $450k · revenue +145%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $450k · revenue +140%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • HO
    Hands of Hope
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -22%
  • GIVEDIRECTLY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -32%
  • SP
    SIMPLE POSITIVE PLAY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

4
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc

Gleaners' mission is to be a leader in the fight against hunger. we do this by joining with others to optimize equitable access to nutritious food for those of us facing hunger and working to overcome the conditions causing food insecurity.

7
Institute of Food Technologists

As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…

8
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
9
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
12
Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern Wi

Second harvest foodbank exists to end hunger in southwestern wisconsin.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is North County Meals on Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $10,530,237 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $450,000 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $300,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $245,000 · Food & NutritionNorth County Meals on Wheels — $85,000 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $450,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $270,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $90,000 · HealthSALVATION ARMY — $180,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK — $100,000 · OtherALL THINGS POSSIBLE MINISTRIES — $80,000 · OtherCARE AND REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE — $60,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS — $60,000 · OtherPEO FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherBLESSINGS IN THE STORM — $40,000 · Other+3 more — $45,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $400,000 · InternationalECHO Inc — $120,000 · InternationalHands of Hope — $20,000 · InternationalIllinois Institute of Technology — $400,000 · EducationCOTTEY COLLEGE — $80,000 · EducationGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $20,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$10,530,237Food & Nutrition$1,080,000Health$810,000Other$625,000International$540,000Education$480,000Human Services$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $10,530,237 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $450,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $450,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $400,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology — $400,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $300,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $270,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $245,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetECHO Inc — $120,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorth County Meals on Wheels — $85,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetCOTTEY COLLEGE — $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHands of Hope — $20,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ECHO Inc
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds North County Meals on Wheels
  • Who funds COTTEY COLLEGE
  • Who funds Hands of Hope
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hardison Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hardison Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hardison Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph