Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harborview Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of The Harborview Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Harborview Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’21
4
’22
5
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.8MHealth$630kScience & Tech$420kCivil Rights$160kPublic Benefit$160kArts & Culture$100k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $395k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$500,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$250,000
ASIAN AMERICAN SCHOLAR FORUM INC$100,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$100,000
INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$80,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$65,000
ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$50,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $600k → 17%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $250k → 17%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%UNIV OF CHICAGO FBO THE DIVISION OF THE BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES: $330k → 14%FU FOUNDATION SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE - COLUMBIA UNIV: $125k → 17%UNITED CHINESE AMERICANS: $160k → 14%UNIV OF CHICAGO FBO THE DIVISION OF THE BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES: $170k → 14%FU FOUNDATION SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE - COLUMBIA UNIV: $125k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $500k → 14%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $65k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $35k → 17%ASIAN AMERICAN SCHOLAR FORUM INC: $100k → 17%ASIAN AMERICAN SCHOLAR FORUM INC: $100k → 17%MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $100k → 17%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $200k → 17%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 4 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$1.2M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+1251%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2023–2024 · $550k · revenue +21%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    2× · 2022–2023 · $300k · revenue +19%
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICAN SCHOLAR FORUM INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF CHICAGO FBO THE DIVISION OF THE BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • FF
    FU FOUNDATION SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE - COLUMBIA UNIV
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • UC
    UNITED CHINESE AMERICANSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $160k · revenue +94% · 53% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
3
Institute of Asian Scholars

naisA Global is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization dedicated to helping talented young Asian professionals unlock their potential and become great leaders. It is the only non-profit of its kind to provide a global platform to…

—
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
6
Center for Advanced China Research
—
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Academy of International Business

We create, nurture, and empower a global community of scholars focused on creating, advancing, and disseminating knowledge in international business research, education, policy, and practice.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian American Scholar Forum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Illinois Institute of Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $950,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORKUniversity of Chicago: $550,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $300,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIASIAN AMERICAN SCHOLAR FORUM INC: $200,000 · EducationASIAN AMERICAN SCHOLAR FORUM INC+1 more: $50,000 · EducationUNIV OF CHICAGO FBO THE DIVISION OF THE BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES: $500,000 · OtherUNIV OF CHICAGO FBO THE DIVISION…FU FOUNDATION SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE - COLUMBIA UNIV: $250,000 · OtherFU FOUNDATION SCHOOL OF ENGINEER…UNITED CHINESE AMERICANS: $160,000 · OtherUNITED CHINESE AMERICANSINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $160,000 · Public BenefitMUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $100,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,050,000Other$910,000Public Benefit$160,000Arts & Culture$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $950,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $550,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN SCHOLAR FORUM INC: $200,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetUNITED CHINESE AMERICANS: $160,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harborview Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harborview Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harborview’s filings →

    More from the funding graph