Skip to content
The Hanson Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Hanson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$5kHealth$4kAnimals$4kCommunity Improvement$3kRecreation & Sports$2kHuman Services$2kYouth Development$800Food & Nutrition$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
2
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER$500
BADGER STATE BOYS FOUNDATION$400
DUCKS UNLIMITED YELLOW RIVER$300
SAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY$250
SHELL LAKE LIONS CHARITIES$200
WHITE TAILS UNLIMITED-NW WI CHAPTER$200
LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$200
WASHBURN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$200
NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $300 → 12%LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $300 → 12%LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $300 → 12%LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 12%LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 12%LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 12%LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20k · 13 repeat orgs$750 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$20k
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+30%

Still filing today

46%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +30%
  • LF
    LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +395%
  • VU
    VENTURES UNLIMITED INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • JL
    JACK LINK COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200 · revenue +30%
  • VM
    VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK
    one grant, 2022 · $200
  • WC
    WASHBURN COUNTY K9 FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHELL LAKE LIONS CHARITIES INC: $2,700 · OtherSHELL LAKE LIONS CHARITIES INCWASHBURN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,100 · OtherWASHBURN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYWHITE TAILS UNLIMITED-NW WI CHAPTER: $1,650 · OtherWHITE TAILS UNLIMITED-NW WI CHAPTERALZHEIMERS DAY RESPITE PROGRAM: $1,600 · OtherALZHEIMERS DAY RESPITE PROGRAMVENTURES UNLIMITED INC: $1,600 · OtherVENTURES UNLIMITED INCDUCKS UNLIMITED YELLOW RIVER: $1,450 · OtherDUCKS UNLIMITED YELLOW RIVERBADGER STATE BOYS FOUNDATION: $800 · OtherBADGER STATE BOYS FOUNDATIONTHEATRE IN THE WOODS: $700 · Other+4 more: $750 · Other+4 moreSHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC: $3,800 · Community ImprovementSHELL LAKE ARTS CENT…LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,700 · Human ServicesLAKELAND …REGIONAL HOSPICE SERVICES INC: $1,200 · HealthFAITH IN ACTION WASHBURN COUNTY NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR: $700 · Food & NutritionJACK LINK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$13,350Community Improvement$3,800Human Services$1,700Health$1,200Food & Nutrition$700Recreation & Sports$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC: $3,800 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,700 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMERS DAY RESPITE PROGRAM: $1,600 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetVENTURES UNLIMITED INC: $1,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL HOSPICE SERVICES INC: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION WASHBURN COUNTY NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR: $700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJACK LINK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS DAY RESPITE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds VENTURES UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HOSPICE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION WASHBURN COUNTY NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR ↗
  • Who funds JACK LINK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hanson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hanson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hanson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home