Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hammond Community Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$198kHuman Services$24kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$17kArts & Culture$11kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$8kEmployment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,304
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION IN$9,642
HAMMOND CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$5,102
HAMMOND AREA CAREER CENTER$5,054
CHARLES N SCOTT MIDDLE SCHOOL$3,908
HENRY F EGGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL$2,608
ST JOHN BOSCO SCHOOL$2,503
HAMMOND EARLY LEARNING CENTER$2,230
SCHOOL CITY OF HAMMOND$1,500
WASHINGTON IRVING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,483
PROM GENIE II INC$1,304
NEW HOPE TOO COMMUNITY CENTER INC$1,304
HOPE CENTER OF NWI INC$1,304
THE HOPE ANGELS FUND$1,304
BOOKS BRUSHES AND BANDS FOR EDUCATI$1,304
GIRLS ON THE RUN OF NWI$1,304
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROM GENIE II INC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$236k · 35 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
25

Total granted

$236k
$40k

Still filing today

20%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREATER HAMMOND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +96%
  • HC
    Hessville Commerce and Community Creative
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +1%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • HA
    HAMMOND ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • WI
    WASHINGTON IRVING EMENENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hammond Development Corporation

Hammond development corporation (hdc), an indiana not-for-profit organization, was formed to provide broad based charitable support for the development and redevelopment of the city of hammond, including the stimulation of historical…

Community Improvement
2
Hampden Inc
Youth Development
3
Heartland Youth Football League Inc
Recreation & Sports
4
The Hammond Museum Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Hamilton Hall Inc
6
Hamida's Kitchen Inc
Food & Nutrition
7
Hammond Alumcats Inc
Education
8
Humboldt Chamber of Commerce

Community development and industrial recruiting

Arts & Culture
9
Hamilton County Fair Inc
Recreation & Sports
10
Hoosier Shakes Inc

Produce Shakespearian plays

11
Grant Hamill Foundation Inc

Support and supervision of indiana demolay chapters and statewide activities of youth fraternal organizations.

Philanthropy
12
Hamlin Fire & Rescue Company

Hamlin fire & rescue company was organized to provide firefighting & rescue services to lake & salem townships and to serve as a backup to neighboring areas

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Hammond Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Prom Genie Ii Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAMMOND CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL — $24,121 · OtherHAMMOND CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOLHAMMOND CENTRAL HS PSTA — $18,700 · OtherHAMMOND CENTRAL HS PSTABISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION IN — $9,642 · OtherST JOHN BOSCO SCHOOL — $8,503 · OtherNEW HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH — $7,804 · Other+62 more — $165,166 · Other+62 moreBISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $56,379 · ReligionBISHOP NOLL INSTITUT…TOWLE PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY — $5,304 · Arts & CultureHAMMOND REDHAWKS YOUTH FOOTBALL AND CHEER INC — $3,554 · Recreation & SportsHessville Commerce and Community Creative — $3,000 · Community ImprovementMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $2,250 · Food & NutritionProm Genie II INC — $1,304 · Human Services
Other$233,936Religion$56,379Arts & Culture$5,304Recreation & Sports$3,554Community Improvement$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,250Human Services$1,304

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $56,379 over 3y, 17% of budgetTOWLE PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY — $5,304 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHAMMOND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGREATER HAMMOND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHAMMOND REDHAWKS YOUTH FOOTBALL AND CHEER INC — $3,554 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHessville Commerce and Community Creative — $3,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TOWLE PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY
  • Who funds HAMMOND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GREATER HAMMOND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds HAMMOND REDHAWKS YOUTH FOOTBALL AND CHEER INC
  • Who funds Hessville Commerce and Community Creative

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Legacy Foundation IncIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legacy Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hammond Community Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hammond Community Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hammond Community Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph