Loading…
· Private foundation
THE HALL FAMILY FOUNDATION
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$9k
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
3
Communities
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of THE HALL FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$148k
Total assets
Largest grants
- SALVATION ARMY$2,100
- READINGTON TRAIL ASSN$2,000
- STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOU$1,000
- NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$1,000
- NJ AID FOR ANIMALS$1,000
- MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
- MADISON HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SOFTBALL$525
- CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICES$450
- STREET OF DREAMS$215
- MUSCULAR DISTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC$100
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 73% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25k · 9 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
8
Total granted
$25k
$4k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+18%
+34%
Still filing today
56%
38%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NKNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +18%
- NANJ AID FOR ANIMALS2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +13%
- MSMADISON SOFTBALL2× · 2020–2022 · $780 · revenue +79%
Funded once
- SJST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAone grant, 2023 · $1k
- LALHS ATHLETIC SCHOLARSHIP FONDATIONone grant, 2021 · $650
- FFFOUNDATION FOR CHALLENGED CHILDRENone grant, 2021 · $550
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
University of Delaware
Instruction, research, and public services are the university's most significant activities.
—
2
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at
The organization provides medically necessary healthcare services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory manner.
Health
3
Parkinsons Wellness Center of New Jersey Inc
Health
4
Hackensack Meridian Health Inc
The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities.
Health
5
Quinnipiac University
Prepare graduates as enlightened global citizens equipped for careers of the future. (see sch o) quinnipiac university ("qu") is a private, coeducational university where students engage in an educational experience that's both personal…
Education
6
Hunterdon Humane Animal Shelter Inc
Animals
7
Rescue Kitty a Nj Non-Profit Corp
To provide for the feeding, shelter and care of homeless, abandoned, and feral cats. to educate the public about the importance of spay neuter population control, responsible
Animals
8
Wyckoff Senior Citizens Club
Human Services
9
Tnr Works Nj
The trap, neuter and release of feral cats in the township of brick, nj.
Animals
10
Street Cats to Sweet Cats Rescue Inc
Animal rescue
Animals
11
Kayce G Speranza Inc
Provide vetinary care, trap/neuter/release services, and find homes for cats in the Morris County area of New Jersey.
Animals
12
Middlesex County Animal Welfare Society Inc
Protection of animals
Animals
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nj Aid for Animals Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Scranton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$23,975Health$3,000Animals$1,800Education$900Recreation & Sports$780
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE HALL FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NJ AID FOR ANIMALS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 203772876 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NJ AID FOR ANIMALS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Hall Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Hall Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines