Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Haley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$521kEducation$448kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kInternational$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$100Public Benefit$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$57,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$791k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HONEYSUCKLE CHURCH OF CHRIST$57,000
FLORIDA COLLEGE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 17%DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION: $547 → 17%DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 17%DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION: $402 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$956k · 7 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$956k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
0%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FLORIDA COLLEGE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $448k · revenue +75%
  • TT
    THE THOMLEY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +45%
  • DR
    DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTHWEST CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • MO
    MUSUEM OF BIBLICAL HISTORY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Timothy Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Salvation Army Trust Created By Thomas
Human Services
3
The Barnabas Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
5
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
6
The Barnabas Group Ltd
Religion
7
Foundational Questions Institute
Philanthropy
8
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
9
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
10
Thomas Frank Thatcher Foundation
Philanthropy
11
God's Light in the Darkness Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Christ the Divine Teacher Trust
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Thomley Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HONEYSUCKLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $485,250 · OtherHONEYSUCKLE CHURCH OF CHRISTNORTHWEST CHURCH OF CHRIST: $17,200 · Other+4 more: $13,300 · OtherFLORIDA COLLEGE INC: $448,118 · EducationFLORIDA COLLEGE INCTHE THOMLEY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · ReligionBarnabas Foundation: $500 · ReligionDOTHAN RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,949 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,600 · HealthLeadership Institute: $100 · Public Benefit
Other$515,750Education$448,118Religion$8,500Human Services$2,949Health$1,600Public Benefit$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA COLLEGE INC: $448,118 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE THOMLEY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetDOTHAN RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,949 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA STATE TROOPER ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE THOMLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Barnabas Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA STATE TROOPER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haley’s filings →

More from the funding graph