Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hadnott Foundation Inc co Danielle Hadnott

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Community Improvement$22kEducation$9kHealth$8kScience & Tech$5kPhilanthropy$2kYouth Development$2kReligion$1kArts & Culture$950Other$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
3
States reached
$233k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NJ Chapter Bergen Co Links Inc$1,754
One Hundred Black Men$1,548
North Highland Memorial Comm Center$250
Individual grant recipient$250
National Coalition of 100 Black Wom$200
Lambs of Highgate$150
The Mayor Lizette Parker Fund$150
MLK Birthday Project$100
TEANECK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cancer Who: $500 → 22%IONA College: $1k → 9%Citizens Against Recid: $500 → 13%One Hundred Black Men: $5k → 17%lfetayo Cultural Arts Academy: $700 → 20%WEC Church: $500 → 28%National Breast Cancer Foundation: $750 → 5%Bible Teachers Global Training Cent: $500 → 16%North Highland Memorial Comm Center: $3k → 12%American Cancer Society: $1k → 13%TGIN Foundation: $500 → 14%POP Prevention Opportunity Preparat: $500 → 7%SCANT: $2k → 16%IONA College: $1k → 9%Citizens Against Recid: $201 → 13%One Hundred Black Men: $3k → 17%lfetayo Cultural Arts Academy: $250 → 20%North Highland Memorial Comm Center: $2k → 12%American Cancer Society: $500 → 13%The Mayor Lizette Parker Fund: $150 → 7%Rutgers University: $1k → 16%IONA College: $500 → 9%Lambs of Highgate: $200 → 13%One Hundred Black Men: $2k → 17%North Highland Memorial Comm Center: $1k → 12%NAACP BENGEN COUNTY: $250 → 7%IONA College: $500 → 9%Lambs of Highgate: $150 → 13%One Hundred Black Men: $2k → 17%North Highland Memorial Comm Center: $1k → 12%TUMC Children Ministry: $2k → 7%WestCOP: $200 → 9%One Hundred Black Men: $2k → 17%North Highland Memorial Comm Center: $250 → 12%NJ Chapter Bergen Co Links Inc: $2k → 7%One Hundred Black Men: $500 → 17%NJ Chapter Bergen Co Links Inc: $2k → 7%Ronald Mcdonald House: $500 → 17%NJ Chapter Bergen Co Links Inc: $1k → 7%MSK: $2k → 17%NJ Chapter Bergen Co Links Inc: $1k → 7%MSK: $500 → 17%Holy Name Hospital: $1k → 7%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen: $1k → 17%National Coalition of 100 Black Wom: $500 → 7%Holy Name Hospital: $500 → 7%National Coalition of 100 Black Wom: $200 → 7%Jerk D Restaurant: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39k · 12 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$39k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+454%

Still filing today

42%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ONE HUNDRED BLACK MEN INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +59%
  • NH
    North Highland Memorial Comm Center
    5× · 2018–2023 · $7k
  • NC
    NJ Chapter Bergen Co Links Inc
    4× · 2017–2023 · $5k

Funded once

  • TC
    TUMC Children Ministry
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • S
    SCANT
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • MS
    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE HUNDRED BLACK MEN INC: $13,412 · OtherONE HUNDRED BLACK MEN INCNorth Highland Memorial Comm Center: $7,100 · OtherNorth Highland Memorial Comm CenterNJ Chapter Bergen Co Links Inc: $5,254 · OtherNJ Chapter Bergen Co Links IncMSK: $2,500 · OtherMSKTUMC Children Ministry: $2,000 · OtherSCANT: $1,500 · OtherHoly Name Hospital: $1,500 · Other+16 more: $8,201 · Other+16 moreIONA UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,500 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $750 · HealthTGIN FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthKECHIES PROJECT INC: $1,750 · Youth DevelopmentIFETAYO CULTURAL ARTS ACADEMY INC: $950 · Arts & Culture
Other$41,467Education$3,000Health$2,750Youth Development$1,750Arts & Culture$950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE HUNDRED BLACK MEN INC: $13,412 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIFETAYO CULTURAL ARTS ACADEMY INC: $950 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTGIN FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE HUNDRED BLACK MEN INC ↗
  • Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KECHIES PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds IFETAYO CULTURAL ARTS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TGIN FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hadnott Foundation Inc co Danielle Hadnott funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hadnott Foundation Inc co Danielle Hadnott. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hadnott Foundation Inc co Danielle Hadnott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph