Skip to content
The Hadanou Collective at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Hadanou Collective

Hadanou collective (hnc) works to solve systemic issues that keep the social sector from being as impactful as it should.

$5.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$2.2MFood & Nutrition$1.9MCrime & Legal$1.7MEducation$1.2MArts & Culture$1.1MYouth Development$1.1MHuman Services$1.0MCommunity Improvement$350kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.9M
$120,186
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUEBLO FOOD PROJECT$1,571,386
COLORADOREADS$750,000
COLORADO PERINATAL MENTAL$689,511
PROMOTORES DE ESPERANZA$359,534
SHOOTING STARS CULTURAL AND LEADERS$282,700
ASIAN GIRLS IGNITE$279,942
FIT 4 RECOVERY$233,150
CLINICAL TRUST FOUNDATION$216,374
JUNTOS POR GUNNISON$204,426
MONTESSORI ON WHEELS$148,003
LEGACY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY & COMM$120,186
METRO DEEP$104,996
VOCAL COALITION$100,139
DASHR$97,879
LUPITAS CAMINO A LA ESPERANZA$93,382
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FROM THE HEART: $47k → 12%FROM THE HEART: $24k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.9M · 14 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$7.9M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

36%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PUEBLO FOOD PROJECT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.9M
  • PI
    PARADIGMONE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.2M · revenue -10% · 34% of their budget
  • CP
    COLORADO PERINATAL MENTAL HEALTH PROJECT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $847k

Funded once

  • TQ
    TRANS & QUEER YOUTH COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $433k
  • TS
    THE STORYTELLERS PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $426k
  • FM
    FORT MORGAN SOMALI COMMUNITY ASSOCI
    one grant, 2024 · $357k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUEBLO FOOD PROJECT: $1,856,162 · OtherPUEBLO FOOD PROJECTCOLORADO PERINATAL MENTAL HEALTH PROJECT: $846,969 · OtherCOLORADO PERINATAL MENTAL HEALTH PROJECTCOLORADOREADS: $750,000 · OtherCOLORADOREADSASIAN GIRLS IGNITE: $621,189 · OtherASIAN GIRLS IGNITESPERO JUSTICE CENTER: $528,347 · OtherSPERO JUSTICE CENTERSHOOTING STARS CULTURAL AND LEADERS: $505,756 · OtherSHOOTING STARS CULTURAL AND LEADERSTRANS & QUEER YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $432,960 · OtherTHE STORYTELLERS PROJECT: $425,700 · OtherPROMOTORES DE ESPERANZA: $379,534 · OtherFORT MORGAN SOMALI COMMUNITY ASSOCI: $356,798 · OtherMONTESSORI ON WHEELS: $349,804 · Other+13 more: $1,409,520 · Other+13 morePARADIGMONE INC: $1,150,473 · HealthPARADIGMONE INCGYEDI PROJECT: $451,419 · HealthGYEDI PROJECTADAMS PURPOSE: $344,398 · HealthADAMS PURPOSEDEEP IMPACT: $350,496 · Community ImprovementMONTESSORI COLLECTIVE: $73,411 · EducationFrom The Heart Foundation: $71,525 · Human Services
Other$8,462,739Health$1,946,290Community Improvement$350,496Education$73,411Human Services$71,525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARADIGMONE INC: $1,150,473 over 2y, 34% of budgetGYEDI PROJECT: $451,419 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetADAMS PURPOSE: $344,398 over 2y, 73% of budgetFrom The Heart Foundation: $71,525 over 2y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARADIGMONE INC ↗
  • Who funds GYEDI PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds DEEP IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds ADAMS PURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds MONTESSORI COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds From The Heart Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Denver Foundation
The Denver FoundationCO15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hadanou Collective funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hadanou Collective. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hadanou Collective?

    Find your warmest path to The Hadanou Collective through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hadanou Collective’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home