· Private foundation
The Haberman Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM | $8,800 |
| CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM | $8,800 |
| IGLESIA MISION CRISTIANA | $7,500 |
| IGLESIA MISION CRISTIANA | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,150 |
| IHOPE INC | $5,400 |
| IHOPE INC | $5,400 |
| SALVATION CHURCH OF GOD | $4,250 |
| SALVATION CHURCH OF GOD | $4,250 |
| GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| NEW VISION CHURCH OF THE | $2,250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.
38 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PRPacific Research Institute For Public Policy6× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +62%
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +44%
JUDICIAL WATCH INC4× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- ICINTL CENTRAL GOSPEL CHURCH PA TEMPone grant, 2024 · $11k
- SBSOMA BOOSTERSone grant, 2024 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.
To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The institute for defense analyses is organized for the purpose of applied research. the institute for defense analyses provides independent and objective scientific and technological expertise to assist national security decision-makers…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
Pact institute works to achieve strategic objectives that improve the lives of people around the world who are poor and marginalized through innovation, the exploration of new approaches and partnerships, and funding diversification. it is…
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
How this is measured
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds I HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Pacific Research Institute For Public Policy ↗
- Who funds SALVATION CHURCH OF GOD ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN PAWS INC ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds TOUCH INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Haberman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haberman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Haberman’s filings →