· Private foundation
The Guise-Weber Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PONY EXPRESS MUSEUM | $7,000 |
| MARYSVILLE UP HISTORICAL DEPOT | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| MS CO AGENCY ON AGING | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $4,540 |
| RSVP OF NORTHEAST KANSAS | $4,000 |
| MARSHALL COUNTY CONNECTION | $4,000 |
| MARSHALL COUNTY ARTS COOPERATIVE | $3,000 |
| MARSHALL CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| PEPC | $3,000 |
| MARYSVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| AXTELL ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORP | $2,500 |
| ROTARY TOYS FOR TOTS | $2,000 |
| ONEMARYSVILLE | $2,000 |
| MARSHALL COUNTY 4-H | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.
45 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MCMARSHALL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYINC7× · 2019–2025 · $39k · revenue +35%
- MCMARSHALL COUNTY ARTS COOPERATIVE9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +154% · 49% of their budget
- KHKOESTER HOUSE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +202%
Funded once
- WPWATERVILLE PRESERVATION SOCIETYone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -40%
- CMCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
- NNCKCNCone grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Conducting annual agricultural fair
To preserve and maintain the history of nemaha county kanas
Chamber of commerce
To restore and preserve historical structures and memorabilia
Holt co history
Historic preservation of records buildings
Historical society to promote education about kossuth county, iowa history.
Building community through the arts
Preserve, protect, and promote marshalls heritage
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYINC ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY ARTS COOPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds KOESTER HOUSE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WATERVILLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds USD 364 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RSVP OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds MARYSVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR GROWTH INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · R L & Elsa Helvering Estate Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Guise-Weber Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Guise-Weber Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Guise-Weber Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Guise-Weber Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Guise-Weber’s filings →