Skip to content

· Public charity

The Gruber Foundation

The gruber foundation honors individuals in the fields of cosmology, genetics, neuroscience, justice, and women's rights, whose groundbreaking work provides new models that inspire and enable fundamental shifts in knowledge and culture.

$6.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4.8M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of The Gruber Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Yale University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
3
’18
2
’19
1
’20
3
’21
4
’22
2
’23
2
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$36MScience & Tech$1.1MHealth$945kPhilanthropy$200k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $5,204,478, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,079,478 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $875,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $425k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.8M
$150,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$249M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yale University$4,764,478
University of Arizona Foundation$200,000
The Genetics Society of America Inc$150,000
Society for Neuroscience$75,000
Society for Neuroscience$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%University of Arizona Foundation: $200k → 15%Brandeis University: $83k → 8%Children's Hospital Corporation: $300k → 16%The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University: $167k → 7%University of California Berkeley Foundation: $167k → 10%Schwab Charitable Fund: $200k → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100k → 14%Society for Neuroscience: $75k → 14%The Genetics Society of America Inc: $150k → 8%Fusion Partnerships Inc: $17k → 19%COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES AND COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 8%Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund: $167k → 16%Society for Neuroscience: $75k → 14%The Genetics Society of America Inc: $125k → 8%HARVARD UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY: $75k → 8%Society for Neuroscience: $50k → 14%The Genetics Society of America Inc: $75k → 8%Society for Neuroscience: $50k → 14%The Genetics Society of America Inc: $75k → 8%Society for Neuroscience: $50k → 14%The Genetics Society of America Inc: $12k → 8%Society for Neuroscience: $50k → 14%GENETICS SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $50k → 8%Society for Neuroscience: $15k → 14%Genetics Society of America: $50k → 8%Society for Neuroscience: $15k → 14%GENETICS SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $50k → 8%Society for Neuroscience: $15k → 14%Society for Neuroscience: $15k → 14%Society for Neuroscience: $15k → 14%Society for Neuroscience: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Fusion Partnership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Yale University: $35,934,162 · EducationYale University+6 more: $791,666 · EducationSOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE: $635,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $300,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthTHE GENETICS SOCIETY OF AMERICA IN: $587,000 · OtherDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $166,667 · Community ImprovementFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $16,666 · Community Improvement
Education$36,725,828Health$945,000Other$587,000Philanthropy$200,000Community Improvement$183,333

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYale University: $35,934,162 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE: $635,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GENETICS SOCIETY OF AMERICA IN: $587,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $166,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $166,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $166,666 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $83,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $16,666 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDE NOVO CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HEALING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gruber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gruber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • De Novo Center for Justice and Healing: 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gruber Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gruber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gruber’s filings →

More from the funding graph