Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Growmark Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$855k
Granted FY2024still arriving
188
Grants FY2024still arriving
29
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.8MFood & Nutrition$2.4MHuman Services$173kEnvironment$112kYouth Development$89kPhilanthropy$66kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kArts & Culture$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 188 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k168 grants · $282k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $252k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $322k
$2,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$108,650
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$57,500
AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA$55,000
MIDWEST FOOD BANK$50,400
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$50,000
WISCONSIN FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION$35,000
IOWA AGRICULTURE LITERACY FOUNDATIO$29,500
Global Farmer Network$25,000
Illinois Ag Leadership Foundation$21,500
Progressive Agriculture Foundation$20,000
ILLINOIS FOUNDATION FFA$16,920
Necas$13,000
Illinois 4H Foundation$13,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$12,773
University Of Illinois$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $292k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $400 → 9%SALEM4YOUTH: $17k → 12%THE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $2k → 14%HOSPICE OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $100 → 10%HOPE ORPHAN HOME FOUNDATION NFP: $1k → 9%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $41k → 11%SALEM4YOUTH: $17k → 12%VIRGINIA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $833 → 21%JACKSON COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $100 → 10%PROJECT OZ: $100 → 11%PROJECT OZ: $50 → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $51k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%The Baby Fold: $11k → 11%The Baby Fold: $11k → 11%The Baby Fold: $6k → 11%LIFELONG ACCESS: $5k → 11%Marcfirst: $3k → 11%Marcfirst: $3k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $72k → 11%PROJECT OZ: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 160 repeat orgs$838k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

160 repeat relationships: 82 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down; 94 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

160
236

Total granted

$4.9M
$676k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+11%

Still filing today

49%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $268k · revenue +38%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    3× · 2020–2024 · $216k · revenue +74%
  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $142k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • AF
    AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $110k
  • IA
    ILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL ASSOC TREASU
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • AF
    AGRICULTURE FURTURE OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
2
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
3
Illinois Fertilizer & Chemical Association

To assist and represent the crop production supply and service industry and promote the sound stewardship and utilization of agricultural inputs.

—
4
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
5
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
6
Illinois Agricultural Leadership Foundation

To develop knowledgeable and effective leaders to become policy and decision makers for the agricultural industry.

Public Benefit
7
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
8
Missouri Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture

To assist in providing agricultural related education to all persons and developing agricultural leaders for the future.

Youth Development
9
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
10
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
11
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
12
National Farmers Union Foundation

The national farmers union foundation's (nfuf) mission is to empower people to educate our youth, neighbors, media and policymakers on the social, economic and cooperative contributions of family agriculture.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iowa Ffa Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jersey County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

206 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 206 of the 495 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
200/206
Grantees still filing
135/206
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,663,350 · OtherHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGEIAA Foundation: $240,000 · OtherIAA FoundationUniversity Of Illinois Cashier Of: $188,000 · Other+149 more: $2,124,450 · Other+149 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $216,380 · EducationUniversity o…IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $141,787 · EducationIOWA STATE U…ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $82,500 · EducationILLINOIS COL…SPOON RIVER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Education+23 more: $149,115 · Education+23 moreMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $267,650 · Human ServicesSALEM CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $49,450 · Human ServicesTHE BABY FOLD: $47,650 · Human Services+2 more: $12,850 · Human ServicesAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentWisconsin Farm Bureau Foundation Inc: $66,500 · Food & NutritionTHE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Food & NutritionIOWA AGRICULTURE LITERACY FOUNDATION: $29,500 · Food & NutritionFARM RESCUE: $10,000 · Food & NutritionKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTREES FOREVER INC: $80,050 · EnvironmentIOWA AGRICULTURE WATER ALLIANCE: $10,000 · EnvironmentYAHARA PRIDE FARMS INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK: $50,000 · Community ImprovementGIBSON AREA HOUSE REHAB FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementMISSOURI STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,215,800Education$614,782Human Services$377,600Youth Development$227,000Food & Nutrition$161,000Environment$95,050Community Improvement$57,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $267,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIAA Foundation: $240,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $216,380 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $141,787 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $110,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE: $82,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREES FOREVER INC: $80,050 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAGRIBUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF IOWA: $80,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWisconsin Farm Bureau Foundation Inc: $66,500 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetIOWA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetPROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetTHE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSALEM CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $49,450 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BABY FOLD: $47,650 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetLIVING HISTORY FARMS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AGRONOMIC RESEARCH INC: $40,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetNATIONAL AGRI-MARKETING ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetIOWA 4-H FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetIOWA AGRICULTURE LITERACY FOUNDATION: $29,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSPOON RIVER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ASHLAND COUNTY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN COUNTY FARM BUREAU: $20,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSangamon County Farm Bureau: $15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $12,630 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE LAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNortheast Iowa Community College Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELONG ACCESS: $10,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,380 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY FARM BUREAU EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRotary District 6460 Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetIOWA AGRICULTURE WATER ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFARM RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA MCLEAN COUNTY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetBUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO FFA FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJOLIET JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWABASH VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFERTILIZER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMCLEAN CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP ↗
  • Who funds IAA Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TREES FOREVER INC ↗
  • Who funds AGRIBUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds Wisconsin Farm Bureau Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds IOWA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SALEM CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BABY FOLD ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING HISTORY FARMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AGRONOMIC RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AGRI-MARKETING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IOWA 4-H FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IOWA AGRICULTURE LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Illinois Prairie Community Foundation IncIL41× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Illinois Prairie Community Foundation Inc · Parker Kemp Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Snyder Family Foundation Nfp · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Reardon Family Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Chs Foundation · Jx Gives Back Family Foundation Inc · United Way of McLean County · Otto Baum Company Inc Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Growmark Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Growmark Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Growmark Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Growmark Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 495 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Growmark’s filings →

    More from the funding graph