Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Griffith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$326k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$860kEducation$585kEnvironment$388kPhilanthropy$235kArts & Culture$151kFood & Nutrition$113kHealth$99kHousing & Shelter$95kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEGGY NOTEBAERT NATURE MUSEUM$100,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$50,000
FORUM FOR THE FUTURE US$40,000
AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION$25,000
CHRIST IN THE DESERT$20,000
HOLIDAY HOME CAMP$10,000
HIGHER GROUND$10,000
GENEVA LAKE WATER SAFETY PATROL$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
PROJECT DRAWDOWN$10,000
GENEVA AREA FOUNDATION HORTICULTURA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GENEVA LAKE ASSOCIATION$5,000
GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TRINITY FOUNDATION: $512 → 14%SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
SD
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 40 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
28

Total granted

$2.9M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+53%

Still filing today

45%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    4× · 2019–2023 · $502k · revenue +25%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +23%
  • GL
    GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +226%

Funded once

  • TM
    TRINITY METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • GL
    GENEVA LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -8%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
4
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
7
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
8
Natural Resources Foundation of

To protect wisconsin's lands, waters, and wildlife by providing funding, leading partnerships, and connecting all people with nature.

—
9
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

Environment
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired; the most unlike its peers is The International Dark-Sky Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
27/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAPEL ON THE HILL: $572,216 · OtherCHAPEL ON THE HILLNET IMPACT: $230,000 · OtherNET IMPACTCHRIST IN THE DESERT: $175,000 · OtherCHRIST IN THE DESERTGENEVA LAKE DARK SKY INITIATIVE: $118,000 · OtherGENEVA LAKE DARK SKY INITIATIVEHOLIDAY HOME: $95,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORS: $72,000 · Other+48 more: $522,423 · Other+48 moreTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $502,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGEPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $30,748 · EducationPROJECT DRAWDOWN+4 more: $23,320 · EducationTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $250,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHICA…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $92,900 · EnvironmentAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF KISHWAUKETOE: $20,000 · EnvironmentGENEVA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $7,250 · EnvironmentGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $150,000 · Food & NutritionLAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC: $65,703 · Recreation & SportsHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGENEVA LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 · Health+2 more: $1,350 · Health
Other$1,784,639Education$556,068Arts & Culture$251,000Environment$170,150Food & Nutrition$150,000Recreation & Sports$95,703Health$61,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $502,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $250,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNET IMPACT: $230,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $92,900 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetLAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC: $65,703 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $30,748 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGENEVA AREA FOUNDATION INC HORTICULTURAL HALL: $22,500 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF KISHWAUKETOE: $20,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGENEVA LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTABOR ACADEMY: $10,520 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE GENEVA COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGENEVA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $7,250 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeridian Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPETER MICHAEL FOUNDATION: $3,334 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES: $2,538 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE GENEVA FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget4D Ministries: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPENLANDS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY FOUNDATION INC: $512 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds NET IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FORUM FOR THE FUTURE US INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT DRAWDOWN ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA AREA FOUNDATION INC HORTICULTURAL HALL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KISHWAUKETOE ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE GENEVA COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dean L & Rosemarie Buntrock FoundationIL19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dean L & Rosemarie Buntrock Foundation · Carol Bernick Family Foundation · A G Cox Charity Trust Xxxxx9001 · John & Linda Anderson Charitable Foundation · Otzen Family Foundation Incorporated · The John a Miller Family Foundation · Milton R Brown Family Foundation · The Simms Family Foundation · Kunes Family Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Sbk Stearns Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Griffith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Griffith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Griffith Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Griffith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Griffith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph