Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Greater Montana Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$360k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.1MCommunity Improvement$173kEducation$88kEnvironment$48kPublic Benefit$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kFood & Nutrition$26kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $332k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION$47,737
FRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
MAPS MEDIA INSTITUTE$30,000
FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM$24,000
FRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS (COOKE CITY AVALANCHE)$20,000
MONTANA FREE PRESS$20,000
MONTANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
GLACIER NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY (RISE UP MONTANA)$10,000
WORKING QUIET BUTTE (BEYOND YELLOWSTONE)$10,000
BIG SKY FILM INSTITUTE (WHEN THEY WERE HERE)$10,000
INCLUSIVE OUTDOORS PROJECT (LOTUS PRODUCERS)$10,000
VOX BOX ARTS COLLECTIVE (FIRESIDE FILMS)$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of The Greater Montana Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Greater Montana Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 29 repeat orgs$471k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
36

Total granted

$2.2M
$363k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+36%

Still filing today

59%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MAPS MEDIA INSTITUTE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $427k · revenue +80%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $348k · revenue +566%
  • MF
    MONTANA FREE PRESS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +635%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +41%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA SCHOOL OF RADIO-TV
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
The Greater Montana Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Montana Conservation Elders
Environment
4
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Montana Policy Action Inc

To promote public policy solutions that provide increased access to economic opportunities, greater individual freedoms and encourage greater participation in public matters by providing research and recommendation on public policy

Social Science
6
Montanas Outdoor Legacy Foundation

To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.

Environment
7
Montana Business Leadership Council

The mblc exists to encourage and enact business-friendly policies that create good-paying jobs and make montana a better place to live. the primary purpose of the mblc is to educate the public on important business issues, enable citizens…

Community Improvement
8
Montana State Parks Foundation

The montana state parks foundation raises private support to enhance the visitors experience and build advocates for montanas state parks and recreation heritage.

Recreation & Sports
9
Colt Family Foundation Montana
Philanthropy
10
Save our Gallatin Front Inc
Environment
11
The Pulp

The Pulp is dedicated to publishing accurate and relevant news and information that informs and engages the people of Missoula and western Montana. Through our journalism we aim to promote discourse, foster civic engagement and create…

Arts & Culture
12
Missoula Midtown Foundation

Funding and conducting research on issues associated with the ongoing development, infrastructure, historical preservation, and planning of Missoula Midtown and operating educational programs to educate the public about these issues.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana History Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bear Hug Cattle Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $177,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMONTANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION: $170,533 · OtherMONTANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM: $129,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA SCHOOL OF JOURNALISMMONTANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION - CRANEY AWARDS: $106,991 · OtherMONTANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION - CRANEY AWARDSDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $95,647 · OtherDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · Other+45 more: $508,096 · Other+45 moreMAPS MEDIA INSTITUTE INC: $426,500 · Arts & CultureMAPS MEDIA INSTITUTE INCFRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INC: $347,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INCMONTANA FREE PRESS: $130,000 · Arts & CultureMONTANA FREE PRESSFrom The Heart Productions: $108,000 · Arts & CultureFrom The Heart Productions+8 more: $142,000 · Arts & Culture+8 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationBEAR HUG CATTLE CO: $23,500 · EducationLEADERSHIP MONTANA INC: $10,000 · EducationMontana State University Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EducationARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationMEAGHER COUNTY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL: $15,500 · EnvironmentMONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · EnvironmentALTERNATIVE ENERGY RESOURCES ORG: $8,000 · EnvironmentMONTANA CASAGAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMON GROUND PROJECT: $12,000 · Public BenefitBOZEMAN INTERFAITH HOUSING INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,322,767Arts & Culture$1,154,000Education$81,000Environment$36,000Human Services$13,000Public Benefit$12,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAPS MEDIA INSTITUTE INC: $426,500 over 8y, 24% of budgetFRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INC: $347,500 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetMONTANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION: $170,533 over 5y, 14% of budgetMONTANA FREE PRESS: $130,000 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $108,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBEAR HUG CATTLE CO: $23,500 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetEXTREME HISTORY PROJECT: $23,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetThunderheart Media Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetUSS MONTANA COMMITTEE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetBIG SKY FILM INSTITUTE: $18,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMEAGHER COUNTY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL: $15,500 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetTHE MYRNA LOY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetONE MONTANA: $15,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMON GROUND PROJECT: $12,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetMONTANA CASAGAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP MONTANA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOZEMAN INTERFAITH HOUSING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALTERNATIVE ENERGY RESOURCES ORG: $8,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWINNETT ACES INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMISSOULA BUTTERFLY HOUSE AND INSECTARIUM: $6,075 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMONTANA PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNATE CHUTE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBILLINGS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAPS MEDIA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MONTANA PBS INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FREE PRESS ↗
  • Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAR HUG CATTLE CO ↗
  • Who funds EXTREME HISTORY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Thunderheart Media Inc ↗
  • Who funds USS MONTANA COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MEAGHER COUNTY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE MYRNA LOY ↗
  • Who funds CROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMON GROUND PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA CASAGAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP MONTANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT26.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Humanities Montana · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Montana History Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Treacy Foundation · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Otto Bremer Trust · Sample Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Greater Montana Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Greater Montana Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Greater Montana Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Greater Montana Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Montana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph