Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Grassano Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$13kEducation$11kPublic Benefit$8kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$975Religion$850Animals$740Housing & Shelter$415Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST EDWARDS SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%TOWERS FOUNDATION: $105 → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $100 → 13%JUDICIAL WATCH: $1k → 14%ST EDWARDS SCHOOL: $10k → 12%PAACT INC: $100 → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $100 → 14%HALO: $200 → 15%LYME AMBULANCE ASSOC: $100 → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $900 → 17%THE BCCA CHARITABLE TRUST: $100 → 6%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $1k → 7%UNITED AMERICAN PATRIOTS: $150 → 9%ORCA: $150 → 22%JUDICIAL WATCH: $1k → 14%ST EDWARDS SCHOOL: $1k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $652 → 17%THE BCCA CHARITABLE TRUST: $100 → 6%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $900 → 7%ORCA: $100 → 22%JUDICIAL WATCH: $825 → 14%RAINING CATS RESCUE: $340 → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $484 → 17%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $750 → 7%JUDICIAL WATCH: $525 → 14%RAINING CATS RESCUE: $100 → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $400 → 17%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $650 → 7%JUDICIAL WATCH: $315 → 14%MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDENS: $200 → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $300 → 17%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $300 → 7%YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION: $650 → 12%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $300 → 7%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $177 → 14%YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION: $400 → 12%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $65 → 14%YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION: $400 → 12%HEALTHY START OF INDIAN RIVER CTY: $350 → 12%INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST: $350 → 12%INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST: $250 → 12%INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST: $175 → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $125 → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $125 → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $100 → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IRC: $140 → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IRC: $100 → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IRC: $80 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
SD
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23k · 13 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$23k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+36%

Still filing today

23%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Public BenefitEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $4k · revenue +141%
  • IR
    INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $775 · revenue +83%
  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $307 · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HS
    HEALTHY START OF INDIAN RIVER CTY
    one grant, 2017 · $350
  • H
    HALO
    one grant, 2020 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
7
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
10
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
11
Museum of the American Revolution

The museum of the american revolution uncovers and shares compelling stories about the diverse people and complex events that sparked america's ongoing experiment in liberty, equality and self-government.

Arts & Culture
12
Us Naval Academy Foundation Inc

To support, promote, and advance the mission of the naval academy.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST EDWARDS SCHOOL: $11,000 · OtherST EDWARDS SCHOOLTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC: $10,000 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND CLINICST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $2,736 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCHYOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION: $1,700 · OtherYOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION+16 more: $3,470 · Other+16 moreLeadership Institute: $4,010 · Public BenefitLeadership InstituteJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,955 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $307 · Public BenefitINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $775 · EnvironmentMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $200 · EnvironmentUnited American Patriots Inc: $150 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $100 · EducationTHE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$28,906Public Benefit$8,272Environment$975Education$250Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLeadership Institute: $4,010 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,955 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $775 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $307 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited American Patriots Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYME AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds United American Patriots Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LYME AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Grassano Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Grassano Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grassano Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph