Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Grace Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$626k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$619k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Environment$652kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$20kPhilanthropy$10kEducation$10kReligion$6kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k6 grants · $7k
  • $250k+1 grant · $619k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA BOTANIC GARDENS$619,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,000
NEW HOPE OKLAHOMA$1,000
HELPING HANDS MINISTRY - FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
TULSA GIRLS' ART SCHOOL$1,000
JOHN 316 MISSION$1,000
TULSA TOWN HALL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $5k → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $1k → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $1k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$705k · 11 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$705k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+60%

Still filing today

36%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TULSA BOTANIC GARDENS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $651k
  • TH
    THE HARVEST
    3× · 2017–2021 · $20k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12k

Funded once

  • TULSA AREA UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +69%
  • THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
2
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
3
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
4
Tulsa School of Arts and Sciences

The mission of tsas middle and high school is to provide students a multi-strand liberal arts education in a safe, supportive, individualized and challenging school environment through a college preparatory curriculum.

Education
5
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
6
111 Tulsa Inc

111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.

—
7
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
8
Possibilities Inc

Possibilities values-driven transformative experiences train diverse people in methods of community engagement to lead, innovate, and facilitate change. in short, possibilities grows local capacity to work for positive change. the building…

Community Improvement
9
The Good Okc

The Good OKC was created to equip and empower the people of OKC to experience the Kingdom of God in the everyday lives. Far too often we seperate our spiritual lives from our actual life. We believe following Jesus is a 24/7 endeavor and…

Religion
10
Tulsa Classroom Teachers Association Inc

To strengthen the institutions in which we work, to improve the quality of the services we provide, to bring together all members to assist and support one another, and to promote democracy, human rights, and freedom in our association.

—
11
The Verge Entrepreneurship Hub Foundation
Community Improvement
12
Livefree Okc Inc

Dramatically reduce gun violence in impacted Oklahoma communities through intervention and effective provision of resources.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors Along the Line; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TULSA BOTANIC GARDENS: $650,505 · OtherTULSA BOTANIC GARDENS+15 more: $67,475 · Other+15 moreNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $5,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSION: $2,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,350 · ReligionPETRA KIDS MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTown Hall of Tulsa Corp: $500 · Community ImprovementOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $250 · Health
Other$717,980Human Services$8,000Youth Development$3,500Religion$2,350Arts & Culture$1,000Community Improvement$500Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Town & Country School Inc: $4,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPETRA KIDS MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Land Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTown Hall of Tulsa Corp: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE ↗
  • Who funds The Town & Country School Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PETRA KIDS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds The Land Institute ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds Town Hall of Tulsa Corp ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grace & Franklin Bernsen FoundationOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Atkinson Family Foundation Inc · Broadhurst Foundation · The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Grace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Grace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Grace Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Grace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph