Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Good Neighbor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$153kEducation$68kReligion$27kPublic Benefit$8kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$6kCrime & Legal$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $153k
$16,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$152,669
PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE$16,000
ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%STAND FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Good Neighbor Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 85%.

The Good Neighbor Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 13 repeat orgs$262k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
47

Total granted

$29k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+38%

Still filing today

38%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Blue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +203%
  • TT
    THE THOMAS JEFFERSON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +24%
  • SB
    SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • NE
    NORTHMINSTER EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • RG
    R G BRYANT SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • MS
    Monacan Scholarship Fund Inc R G Bryant Monacan Scholarship Fund Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
2
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
3
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
4
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
5
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
6
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
7
Goucher College

Goucher College provides an innovative liberal arts education that prepares students with a broad, humane perspective for a life of inquiry, creativity, and critical and analytical thinking. The College's vision is to become a top-100…

Education
8
Albany Law School

Higher education: Albany Law School is an institution of higher education that provides instructional and educational activities singularly focused on the study of law. Completion of the programs by students culminates in the awarding of…

Education
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Roanoke College

Roanoke College develops students as whole persons and prepares them for responsible lives of learning, service, and leadership by promoting their intellectual, ethical, spiritual and personal growth.

Education
11
Wiley College

Provide a liberal arts education with globally focused endeavors to provide an intellectually stimulating environment, promoting student competencies in communication, as well as critical and analytical thinking.

Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sweet Briar Institute; the most unlike its peers is Adopt a Love Story. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $152,669 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTHMINSTER EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $21,500 · OtherNORTHMINSTER EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHR G BRYANT SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · OtherRG BRYANT MONICAN SCHOLARSHIP FND: $9,500 · Other+50 more: $53,700 · Other+50 morePATRICK HENRY COLLEGE: $16,000 · EducationPATRICK HENRY …ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationALICE LLOYD CO…Monacan Scholarship Fund Inc R G Bryant Monacan Scholarship Fund Inc: $7,850 · EducationMonacan Schola…DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationDELAWARE STATE…SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $1,600 · EducationLeadership Institute: $8,000 · Public BenefitBlue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc: $2,650 · HealthTHE STAND FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesMercatus Center Inc: $800 · Social ScienceVIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC: $600 · Animals
Other$247,369Education$38,450Public Benefit$8,000Health$2,650Human Services$1,000Social Science$800Animals$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATRICK HENRY COLLEGE: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc: $2,650 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE THOMAS JEFFERSON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE HEALTH CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVirginia Legal Aid Society Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A LOVE STORY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH LIFE FOUNDATION OF RICHMOND: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAUREL GROVE FIRE AND RESCUE INC: $500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOLIDAY LAKE 4-H EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Monacan Scholarship Fund Inc R G Bryant Monacan Scholarship Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Blue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE THOMAS JEFFERSON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
  • Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercatus Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Lynchburg Community FoundationVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Good Neighbor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Good Neighbor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Delaware State University: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Neighbor’s filings →

More from the funding graph