Skip to content

· Public charity

The Good Food Institute Inc

To harness the power of food innovation and markets to make the global food system better for the planet, people, and animals by supporting efforts to make alternative proteins accessible, affordable, and delicious.

$4.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.8MScience & Tech$2.7MEnvironment$819kEducation$702kHealth$601kPhilanthropy$545kHuman Services$350kRecreation & Sports$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $1,019,935, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,573,258 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,553,323 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $764k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$246,178
Median grant
5
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DECO LABS$250,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$249,999
CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$246,178
DPROTEIN INC$218,296
CONSERVATION X LABS INC$50,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$5,462
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $350k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $350k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $3.5M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.9M · 55% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: UPCYCLING WHEAT BRAN TO A NEW GENERATION OF FERMENTATION-BASED INGREDIENTS VIA HIGH THROUGHOUT SCREENING AND PROCESS UPSCALING (WHEAT-UP) · KAZBAR INNOVATIVE MEAT PROTEIN ALTERNATIVES PRODUCED THROUGH COST-EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES · FEENIX - ADVANCING CIRCULAR FOOD VALUE CHAINS WITH THE REPURPOSING OF SUNFLOWER SEED PROCESSING SIDE STREAMS

South America$929k · 26% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT OF OLEAGINOUS YEAST EXTRACT HYDROLYSATES FROM A SUSTAINABLE MULTI-STEP PROCESS USING LUPIN WASTE BIOMASS FOR THE CULTIVATED MEAT INDUSTRY · SOCCOL LOW-COST CULTIVATION MEDIA DERIVED FROM ALGAE AND EDIBLE FUNGI FOR CELLULAR MEAT PRODUCTION IN A CIRCULAR ECONOMY APPROACH · MATCH-FUNDING PROPOSAL FOR ALTERNATIVE PROTEINS

Middle East and North Africa$329k · 9% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: DEVELOPING FAT REPLACEMENT FOR BIO-PRINTED CULTIVATED MEAT IN THE FORM OF PICKERING EMULSIONS STABILIZED WITH NANOPARTICLES; ENHANCING S-BASED COMPOUND LEVELS IN CROPS; HARNESSING NATURALLY FIBRIL-FORMING PROTEINS OF THE EDIBLE FUNGUS NEUROSPORA INTERMEDIA TO FORM MEAT ALTERNATIVES: TOWARDS CIRCULAR BIOECONOMY, SUSTAINABILITY AND FOOD SECURITY · ROADMAP AND KEY STEPS FOR ALTERNATIVE PROTEINS TOWARD FOOD SECURITY · DEVELOPMENT OF SUNA: A SEAWEED BASED ALTERNATIVE TO CANNED TUNAMIMICKING FAT PERCEPTION - PEPTIDE-BASED CD36 ACTIVATION FOR ENHANCED FOOD SENSORY EXPERIENCE

East Asia and the Pacific$326k · 9% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: JUAN DU: OPTIMIZING SEAWEED PROTEINS TO CULTIVATED MEAT (SEATOMEAT) · R&D GAP ANALYSIS, NOMENCLATURE STUDY, NUTRITION AND ADVANCED MARKET SHAPINT WORKS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 8 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +138% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
25

Total granted

$3.9M
$5.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
+37%

Still filing today

25%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $764k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS
    3× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $566k
  • MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $518k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • MI
    Meridian Institute
    one grant, 2023 · $545k · revenue +15%
  • CA
    CLIMATE ADVISERS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $520k
  • CN
    Charity Navigatorgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
10
Yale University

To improve the world through research, scholarship, education, preservation, and practice.

Education
11
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Tufts College; the most unlike its peers is Terasaki Inst for Biomedical Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $1,096,432 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $566,346 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISCLIMATE ADVISERS INC: $520,000 · OtherCLIMATE ADVISERS INCMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $518,020 · OtherMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INCWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $499,824 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $479,999 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $300,000 · Other+21 more: $3,875,424 · Other+21 moreLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $249,998 · EducationSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $203,784 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College: $144,776 · EducationCornell University: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $24,957 · Education+1 more: $7,000 · EducationMeridian Institute: $544,900 · PhilanthropyCharity Navigator: $350,000 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $250,000 · Recreation & SportsCONSERVATION X LABS INC: $50,000 · AnimalsBROWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$7,856,045Education$680,515Philanthropy$544,900Human Services$350,000Recreation & Sports$250,000Animals$50,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMeridian Institute: $544,900 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $518,020 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCharity Navigator: $350,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetNorthwestern University: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $249,998 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $203,784 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $144,776 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION X LABS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTERASAKI INST FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCornell University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $24,957 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Meridian Institute ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION X LABS INC ↗
  • Who funds TERASAKI INST FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Good Food Institute Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Good Food Institute Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Good Food Institute Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Good Food Institute Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Food Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph