Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gillette Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$111kReligion$87kHealth$25kEducation$23kAnimals$17kEnvironment$15kHousing & Shelter$10kPublic Benefit$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$519k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STRATFORD HALL$5,000
CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT$5,000
HUI NO'EAU VISUAL ARTS CENTER$2,000
SYC CARES FOUNDATION$2,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$2,000
MAYO CLINIC$1,000
RIVERSIDE THEATER$1,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
BUSHNELL VETERINARY SERVICE ANGEL FUND$1,000
THE SAWGRASS FOUNDATION$1,000
LES CHENEAUX COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
THE JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION$500
LES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL$500
JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE$500
INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CEDAR POST THRIFT STORE & PANTRY: $700 → 14%CEDAR POST THRIFT STORE & PANTRY: $500 → 14%CEDAR POST THRIFT STORE & PANTRY: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
VA
KS
TN
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$277k · 31 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
24

Total granted

$277k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+18%

Still filing today

68%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    STRATFORD HALL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $47k · revenue +6%
  • HN
    HUI NO'EAU
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +16%
  • TL
    THE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF HOLY INNOCENTS
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • LR
    LILY'S RAINBOW MEMORIAL FUND - ST CHRYSOSTOM'S DAY SCHOOL & FLOWER GARDEN
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • FB
    Forest Bluff Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +150%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
2
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
3
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
4
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
5
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
6
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
7
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
8
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
9
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

—
10
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
11
Longhouse Reserve

Longhouse reserve inspires living with art in all forms. founded by jack lenor larsen, its collections, gardens, art and programs reflect world cultures.

Education
12
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Forest Open Lands Association; the most unlike its peers is Art Empowerment for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $46,700 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRITHUI NO'EAU: $35,750 · OtherHUI NO'EAUCHURCH OF THE HOLY INNOCENTS: $15,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HOLY INNOCENTSHOLY INNOCENTS' CHURCH: $14,000 · OtherHOLY INNOCENTS' CHURCHWOMAN'S BOARD NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL: $13,500 · OtherWOMAN'S BOARD NORTHWESTERN MEMORIALART EMPOWERMENT FOR LIFE: $12,000 · OtherART EMPOWERMENT FOR LIFECHURCH OF HOLY INNOCENTS: $8,200 · OtherLES CHENEAUX FOUNDATION: $6,975 · Other+32 more: $36,395 · Other+32 moreSTRATFORD HALL: $47,200 · Arts & CultureSTRATFORD HALLMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER: $7,500 · Arts & CultureMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL…+3 more: $1,400 · Arts & CultureLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $5,500 · EducationLES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC: $4,825 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $4,100 · EducationTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $3,500 · EducationSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $8,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $7,000 · Animals+2 more: $500 · AnimalsTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterMAYO CLINIC: $5,500 · HealthTHE WOMAN'S BOARD OF NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,500 · HealthSYC CARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · HealthINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,200 · EnvironmentLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $1,100 · EnvironmentLAKE FOREST GARDEN CLUB: $400 · Environment
Other$188,520Arts & Culture$56,100Education$17,925Animals$15,500Housing & Shelter$10,000Health$10,000Environment$7,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTRATFORD HALL: $47,200 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHUI NO'EAU: $35,750 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetART EMPOWERMENT FOR LIFE: $12,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLES CHENEAUX FOUNDATION: $6,975 over 6y, 67% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAWGRASS FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC: $4,825 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $4,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $3,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJAMESTOWN FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMAN'S BOARD OF NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSYC CARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR POST INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForest Bluff School: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST GARDEN CLUB: $400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELAWA FARM FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STRATFORD HALL ↗
  • Who funds HUI NO'EAU ↗
  • Who funds ART EMPOWERMENT FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds LES CHENEAUX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SAWGRASS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMAN'S BOARD OF NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SYC CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR POST INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Forest Bluff School ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Butler Family FoundationIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Butler Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Red Bird Hollow Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Seven C Foundation · Hedberg Foundation Inc · Clarks Fork Foundation · The Gorter Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gillette Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gillette Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gillette’s filings →

More from the funding graph