Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George and Margaret Zivelonghi Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$150kReligion$90kEducation$75kHealth$65kInternational$25kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUEEN OF THE HOLY ROSARY - WEA SCHOOL$15,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
BOYS TOWN$5,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$5,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$5,000
MACULAR DEGENERATION ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $5k → 15%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $5k → 15%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
SD
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 11 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +78% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$340k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+78%

Still filing today

55%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +86%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +112%
  • MD
    Macular Degeneration Association
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • UM
    UW MEDICINE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • UM
    UW MEDICINE DIABETIC RESEARCH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
11
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities Inc

American lebanese syrian associated charities, inc. (alsac) was founded in 1957 and exists solely to raise funds and build awareness to sustain and grow the mission of st. jude children's research hospital, inc. to advance cures, and means…

Religion
12
Sunnyview Hospital and Rehabilitation Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sunnyview rehabilitation hospital is a member of st. peter's health…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

QUEEN OF THE HOLY ROSARY: $90,000 · OtherQUEEN OF THE HOLY ROSARYQUEEN OF THE HOLY ROSARY - WEA SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherQUEEN OF THE HOLY ROSARY - WEA SCHOOLSALVATION ARMY: $20,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY (NORTHWEST DIVISION YAKIMA VALLEY): $10,000 · OtherMACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH: $10,000 · OtherUW MEDICINE: $10,000 · OtherUW MEDICINE DIABETIC RESEARCH: $10,000 · OtherUW MEDICINE DIABETES RESEARCH: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INCLittle Sisters of The Poor: $15,000 · Human ServicesLittle Sisters of The PoorFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $15,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' HomeWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationSTEPHEN S…Macular Degeneration Association: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$210,000Human Services$120,000Education$35,000Health$25,000Religion$15,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMacular Degeneration Association: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Sisters of The Poor: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Macular Degeneration Association ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Little Sisters of The Poor ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George and Margaret Zivelonghi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George and Margaret Zivelonghi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Margaret Zivelonghi’s filings →

More from the funding graph