Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George and Lorraine Bergeron Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$339kHealth$29kPhilanthropy$25kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$24k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$760k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$10,000
NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY$7,500
MAINE AFG INC$1,500
BENTLEY VILLAGE FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $8k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $300 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$384k · 6 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$384k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+43%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    4× · 2017–2020 · $268k · revenue +35%
  • YH
    YOUTH HAVEN INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $13k · revenue +323%
  • NC
    NAMI Collier County Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • YH
    YOUTH HAVEN OF NAPLES
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NF
    NCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $267,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED+1 more: $200 · EducationSUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL US CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $70,000 · OtherSUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL US CATHOLIC CON…YOUTH HAVEN OF NAPLES: $25,000 · OtherYOUTH HAVEN OF NAPLESNCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherNCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONNCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $15,000 · OtherNCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPYTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $10,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OFCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCNCH FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Other+5 more: $5,100 · OtherYOUTH HAVEN INC: $12,800 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 · HealthLOCKS OF LOVE INC: $100 · Health
Education$267,700Other$160,100Human Services$12,800Health$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $267,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $12,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Collier County Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCKS OF LOVE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Collier County Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOCKS OF LOVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George and Lorraine Bergeron Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George and Lorraine Bergeron Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The George and Lorraine Bergeron Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The George and Lorraine Bergeron Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Lorraine Bergeron’s filings →

More from the funding graph