Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gene Roman Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2026still arriving
229
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$369
Largest
01What it funds
012% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Crime & Legal$1kHuman Services$1kReligion$300Arts & Culture$200Philanthropy$200International$200Other$0
02FY2026 · 229 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
2
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$369
Individual grant recipient$350
Individual grant recipient$330
Individual grant recipient$325
Individual grant recipient$305
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$285
Individual grant recipient$270
Individual grant recipient$260
Individual grant recipient$258
QUINCELLA ROBERSON$252
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LAUREN CANNON: $500 → 5%ANDRE CHAVERS: $538 → 7%CHARLES HAACK: $1k → 12%SHERRY SALNICK: $500 → 8%DANIEL SOSNA: $700 → 8%DAN GLOVER: $500 → 7%RACHEL HUDSON: $500 → 7%WALTER MORRIS: $500 → 15%ISABEL ULLOA: $500 → 8%BRIAN RUSH: $1k → 15%ARTHUR HUTSON: $611 → 6%BRIAN METZ: $700 → 14%KEVIN NELSON: $500 → 6%THEODORE MALECKI: $500 → 14%SHARMIKA CUSIC: $600 → 14%NORMAN CAMPBELL: $500 → 7%GILBERT VELEZ: $725 → 14%MARIBEL ROSAS: $650 → 14%MARIA ESCOTO: $550 → 14%ROBERTO ALVAREZ: $500 → 14%MARICELA SILVA: $500 → 14%DELIA CAARENA: $500 → 14%DENISE BRUNSON: $500 → 8%LORRAINE MATTHEWS: $500 → 14%CELESTE SULLIVAN: $500 → 7%NORMAN CAMPBELL: $1k → 7%LINDA BECKER: $814 → 7%CAROLYN LEIGH: $600 → 14%JULIE AGUILAR: $600 → 14%JOSE POLANCO SOTOMAYER: $785 → 14%ROCHELLE LARRY: $600 → 14%NATHANIEL COOPER: $518 → 14%SUSAN DONNICK: $588 → 14%LOUIS ESPINOZA: $600 → 14%SHERRENA GREEN: $1k → 14%MARIA CIESIELSKI: $750 → 14%SHARON GAMBLE: $503 → 14%ARACELI ALVARADO: $794 → 14%DANIEL RISCH: $600 → 14%NICOLE JACKSON: $750 → 14%DONALD LOGGINS: $700 → 14%DWAINE LEE: $600 → 14%IRA MARIE SPANN: $506 → 14%ELIZABETH GONZALEZ: $950 → 14%ALINE HENAGHAN: $1k → 14%MAY SALMAN: $1k → 14%EDITH LOZANO: $850 → 14%JUAN ORTIZ MARTINEZ: $600 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

4%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9k · 13 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 223 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
660

Total granted

$9k
$192k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2024 · $900

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 896 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+200 more: $96,108 · Other+200 more
Other$96,108

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gene Roman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gene Roman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’22
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY22–22
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 896 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gene Roman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph