Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gelsomina Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$43kHousing & Shelter$20kInternational$19kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$3kEnvironment$2kAnimals$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$550
Median grant
1
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROLOLITAN OPERA$10,000
CARNEGIE HALL CORP$4,000
WHITNEY MUSEUM$1,500
WHITNEY MUSEUM$1,500
MOMA MUSEUM$550
MOMA MUSEUM$550
COVENANT HOUSE$500
CITY HARVEST$500
METROPLOITAN MUSEUM OF ART$500
SAVE THE CHILDREN$500
COVENANT HOUSE$500
GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61k · 11 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$61k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-6%

Still filing today

45%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MANY HOPES INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $17k · revenue +253%
  • TC
    THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +17%
  • LR
    LONGHOUSE RESERVE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • OH
    ONE HOMES MANY HOPES
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • TC
    THE CHASING MS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • PE
    PERFECT EARTH PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +139%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
4
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
7
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
8
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
11
Apex Art Curatorial Program Inc

Apex Art Curatorial Program is a resolutely noncommercial visual art exhibition space which provides curators and artists with a venue dedicated to ideas that are often too provocative or too small in scope for display elsewhere. Apex Art…

Arts & Culture
12
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Park Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Victor D'amico Institute of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE HOMES MANY HOPES: $18,000 · OtherONE HOMES MANY HOPESMETROLOLITAN OPERA: $16,500 · OtherMETROLOLITAN OPERATHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $5,500 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERAWQXR: $2,700 · OtherTHE CHASING MS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIO: $2,000 · Other+12 more: $8,550 · Other+12 moreMANY HOPES INC: $17,000 · InternationalMANY HOPES INCPERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC: $1,500 · InternationalPERFECT EARTH PROJECT …THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $8,448 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE HA…WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM …VICTOR D'AMICO INSTITUTE OF ART: $1,000 · Arts & CultureVICTOR D'AMICO …LONGHOUSE RESERVE: $3,000 · EducationCITY HARVEST INC: $2,700 · Food & NutritionCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,500 · Human ServicesCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$53,250International$18,500Arts & Culture$12,448Education$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,700Human Services$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANY HOPES INC: $17,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $8,448 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLONGHOUSE RESERVE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVICTOR D'AMICO INSTITUTE OF ART: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANY HOPES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LONGHOUSE RESERVE ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds VICTOR D'AMICO INSTITUTE OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gelsomina Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gelsomina Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gelsomina’s filings →

    More from the funding graph