Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Garrett Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $61k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S ORGAN TRANSPLANT ASSOCIATION (COTA)$20,000
ASPIRE INDIANA HEALTH$10,800
JACKSON CENTER FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATION$10,000
HEARING THE CALL$10,000
STARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BEACON OF HOPE CRISIS CENTER$5,000
CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES CORP$5,000
TELLURIDE ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,425
BIRDIES FOR BABIES$300
BCC - WELL SPRING CENTER$300
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JACKSON CENTER FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATION: $10k → 9%CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES CORP: $5k → 15%BEACON OF HOPE CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 16%STARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
2
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
3
Aspire Inc

We empower adults with disabilities to lead fulfilling lives. We are committed to creating a community where all people are valued and accepted.

Employment
4
Center for Independence through Conductive Education Inc

To help children and young adults with disabilities achieve their highest level of indepedence in the home, school, comunity and workforce.

Education
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
8
Indiana University Health Blackford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Center for Hearing and Communication

Provide high-quality, comprehensive services to empower people affected by hearing loss, deafness or listening challenges.

10
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

11
Indiana University Health Tipton Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspire Indiana Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jackson Center for Conductive Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JACKSON CENTER FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesJACKSON CENTER FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATIONSTARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSTARTEDUP FOUNDATION INCChildren and Family Services Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesChildren and Family Services IncBEACON OF HOPE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBEACON OF HOPE CENTER FOR WOMEN INCCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association — $20,000 · OtherCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Asso…TELLURIDE ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM — $5,000 · OtherTELLURIDE ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient — $1,425 · Other+2 more — $600 · OtherAspire Indiana Health Inc — $10,800 · HealthAspire Indiana …Hearing the Call Inc — $10,000 · InternationalHearing the Ca…
Human Services$30,000Other$27,025Health$10,800International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAspire Indiana Health Inc — $10,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON CENTER FOR CONDUCTIVE EDUCATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSTARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHearing the Call Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTELLURIDE ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChildren and Family Services Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEACON OF HOPE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Garrett Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Garrett Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Garrett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph