Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gardner Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$119kHealth$94kEnvironment$83kInternational$32kArts & Culture$30kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$11kCrime & Legal$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$491k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$7,000
ACLU$7,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$7,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD-AMERICA$6,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$4,757
EARTHJUSTICE$4,078
JOHNS HOPKINS - AUTOIMMUNE$4,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$4,000
SUSTAINABLE OCEAN ALLIANCE$4,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$3,224
MAGEN DAVID ADOM$2,853
SUNFLOWER OF PEACE$2,853
Individual grant recipient$2,853
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$2,500
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$2,139
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $3k → 8%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $2k → 8%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $2k → 8%DOROT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 32 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
6

Total granted

$414k
$2k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +78%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +10%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    8× · 2018–2025 · $21k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • HW
    HEART WALK (AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION)
    one grant, 2018 · $775
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • FF
    FAIR FIGHT 2020
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
5
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—
7
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
8
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
9
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
10
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACLU: $40,035 · OtherACLUPLANNED PARENTHOOD-AMERICA: $31,641 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD-AMERICAJOHNS HOPKINS - AUTOIMMUNE: $21,064 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS - AUTOIMMUNETHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,882 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $14,086 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $13,367 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERTHE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10,550 · OtherNO KID HUNGRY (SHARE OUR STRENGTH): $10,511 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,369 · OtherTHIRTEEN: $8,169 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,511 · Other+16 more: $35,942 · Other+16 moreENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $21,472 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEF…EARTHJUSTICE: $21,142 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICESUSTAINABLE OCEAN ALLIANCE INC: $14,882 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE OCEAN…SAVE THE SOUND: $10,511 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $39,150 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAM…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $39,150 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN P…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,511 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $7,931 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $6,615 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,541 · InternationalThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $15,818 · Arts & CultureART START INC: $8,684 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $4,130 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,280 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,053 · Health
Other$220,127Environment$68,007Civil Rights$39,150Crime & Legal$39,150International$30,598Arts & Culture$28,632Health$11,333

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $39,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $39,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $21,472 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $21,142 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $15,818 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,882 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE OCEAN ALLIANCE INC: $14,882 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,511 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,511 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $10,511 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,280 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetART START INC: $8,684 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $7,931 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $6,968 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $6,615 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,541 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $4,130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $1,177 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,053 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE OCEAN ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ART START INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds SUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gardner Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gardner Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gardner Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph