Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gama Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$88kHealth$58kHuman Services$18kEducation$17kPhilanthropy$15kReligion$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$567k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE$13,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
SVG FOUNDATION$5,000
EDUCARE FOUNDATION$2,500
LITTLE ESSENTIALS$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LITTLE ESSENTIALS: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$172k · 6 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$172k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+80%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalCivil RightsEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +98%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +28%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • US
    UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

2
Children's Shelter of Cebu

We exist to glorify god by demonstrating his love to the philippines as we provide a loving, christ-centered home with comprehensive medical, educational and placement services for homeless filipino children.

International
3
Childserve Inc

We partner with families to help children with special health care needs live a great life.

4
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
5
Heart Care International Inc

To improve the health of children who suffer from congenital heart disease and live in economically challenged countries around the world

International
6
Advocates for Children Inc Casa of the Sabine Neches Region

Advocacy for abused children

Civil Rights
7
Community Kitchen

Food service for the poor, economically disadvantaged, and elderly.

Food & Nutrition
8
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
9
Christian Care Holding Company Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
10
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
11
The Child Care Connection Inc

Child care connection provides the tools and education to give each child the very best start in life.

Human Services
12
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Educare Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC — $43,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SVG — $15,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SVGNATIONAL CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC — $12,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INCSVG FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherSVG FOUNDATIONUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE — $7,500 · OtherUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCEIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherUniversity of MD Hospital — $5,000 · OtherThe Oaks at Lakewood — $5,000 · Other+2 more — $3,500 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $87,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyEDUCARE FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · EducationANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC — $3,000 · Civil RightsLITTLE ESSENTIALS — $1,500 · Human Services
Other$106,000International$92,500Philanthropy$5,000Education$4,000Civil Rights$3,000Human Services$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $87,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC — $43,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC — $12,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCARE FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE ESSENTIALS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gama Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph