Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fruth Christian Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$188kInternational$30kEducation$30kHousing & Shelter$25kHuman Services$15kHealth$12kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$750Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$92k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEFC CHURCH$10,000
CARLISLE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH$10,000
SEVEETEN LIFE SERVICES$5,000
CURESZ FOUNDATION$5,000
PROJECT CONNECT$5,000
CCAC$5,000
BREAKING BARRIERS TRUST$2,500
NORTH MINISTRIES PRESBYTERIAN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$250
ST JOAN OF ARC CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PAXTON MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%PAXTON MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%PAXTON MINISTRIES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 11 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$259k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+42%

Still filing today

45%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MotoHope Mission Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +2%
  • MU
    MESSIAH UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +9%
  • PS
    PAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $25k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • AM
    ASBURY METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • EF
    ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • NH
    NEW HOPE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
4
Impact for Living Inc

Impact for Living provides conferences, seminars and consulting services to churches and others desiring to make a difference in the world.

Religion
5
PastorServe Inc

Since its founding over twenty years ago, the Organization has used a number of expressions to define its ministry. "Every Pastor Needs a Pastor" has described the underlying purpose of the Organization's ministry since day one. "Healthy…

Religion
6
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
7
Cross to Light Corporation

Cross to Light is a nondenominational Christian organization providing spiritual education and physical aid to people in need around the world. Since 2005, Cross to Light has helped people cross from darkness to light by hearing the Gospel…

Religion
8
Lx Ministries Inc

Our mission is to multiply the global impact and influence of Christian leaders and pastors throughout their organizations and communities. Our activities involve working with members of the leadership of other exclusively charitable…

Religion
9
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
10
Lakelight Institute

Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.

Religion
11
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
12
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Curesz Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEFC CHURCH: $106,000 · OtherCEFC CHURCHSweeten Life Systems: $17,000 · OtherSweeten Life SystemsASBURY METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherASBURY METHODIST CHURCHPROJECT CONNECT: $10,000 · OtherCARLISLE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherTRINITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $7,500 · Other+14 more: $45,900 · Other+14 moreMotoHope Mission Inc: $30,000 · InternationalMotoHope M…MESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationMESSIAH UN…PAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY: $25,000 · Human ServicesIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $14,000 · ReligionFaith and Learning International NFP: $5,000 · ReligionCuresz Foundation: $7,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $750 · Youth Development
Other$211,400International$30,000Education$30,000Human Services$25,000Religion$19,000Health$7,000Youth Development$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMotoHope Mission Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSweeten Life Systems: $17,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCuresz Foundation: $7,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetFaith and Learning International NFP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MotoHope Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Sweeten Life Systems ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Curesz Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Faith and Learning International NFP ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fruth Christian Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fruth Christian Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fruth Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph