· Private foundation
The Frieman Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k84 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $164k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDF | $52,600 |
| COLEL CHABAD | $36,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHIBA HOSPITAL | $36,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNEI RACHEL | $22,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR | $21,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,474 |
| BELEV ECHAD | $12,200 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECH | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZER MIZION | $10,000 |
| STERN COLLEGE | $7,500 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI | $7,000 |
| YESHIVA UNIVERSITY | $5,180 |
| CHARIDY CHESSED VRACH CHARIDYCOM | $4,116 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA BNEI RACHEL | $4,000 |
| CHABAD TORAH CENTER | $3,800 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.
123 repeat relationships: 75 still active in FY2025, 48 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES6× · 2019–2025 · $257k · revenue +115%- AFAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR6× · 2019–2025 · $112k · revenue +18%
- BEBELEV ECHAD INC6× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +577%
Funded once
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF INSTITUTE OF TORAH ETHICSone grant, 2023 · $25k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF INSone grant, 2024 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
To further jewish education in israel
To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel
To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.
How this is measured
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 238 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
- Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
- Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
- Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT BNEI RACHEL ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds Israel Empowered Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HEBRON FUND INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Kedumim Inc ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Darche Noam Inc - David Shapell College of Jewish Studies ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Irving I Moskowitz Foundation · Swieca Children Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Joseph H Feldman Family Foundation Inc · Hyman & Ann Arbesfeld Foundation Inc · Erlbaum Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Frieman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frieman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Frieman’s filings →