How much did THE FREDERICK H LEONHARDT grant in FY2025?

Education$189kEnvironment$172kFood & Nutrition$115kArts & Culture$112kAnimals$66kHuman Services$62kHealth$51kCrime & Legal$50kPhilanthropy$39kOther$491k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

extend trackingtracking metricsconservationfood

2022

supportsreliefsummer campfood

2023

conservationkits

2024

spring awardfallsummerconservation

2025

summersantareadinganimalconservation

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k10 grants · $49k
$10k–50k18 grants · $218k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION$20,000
SANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST$18,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS$15,000
ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOC OF NM$15,000
TREES WATER & PEOPLE$15,000
ALBUQUERQUE MEALS ON WHEELS INC$15,000
ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO$10,000
SITE SANTA FE$10,000
LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CORPO$10,000
TIMUCUAN PARKS FOUNDATION$10,000
COLLINS LAKE AUTISM CENTER$10,000
UNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB$10,000
LIBROS FOR KIDS$10,000
SOUTHWESTERN INDIAN POLYTECHNIC INS$10,000
VERO BEACH ART MUSEUM$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of THE FREDERICK H LEONHARDT’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 71% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 67% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

THE FREDERICK H LEONHARDTlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.0M · 30 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +128% since the first grant, against +84% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.0M

$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%

+84%

Still filing today

77%

66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SN
STOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO
5× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +22%
TW
TREES WATER & PEOPLE
5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +149%
LF
LIBROS FOR KIDS
6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +4293%

Funded once

SR
SLV RETAC
one grant, 2022 · $30k
HS
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TAOS DBA STRAY H
one grant, 2022 · $20k
TC
TENDERLOVE COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +157%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Taos Art Museum

—

Felines & Friends New Mexico

Felines & friends is a "second chance" rescue and placement organization focusing on providing vet care and socialization for cats and kittens who might not otherwise find homes through animal shelters. since 2002, we have placed over…

Animals

New Mexico Ballet Company

To create and promote professional and innovative dance productions for New Mexico audiences while providing the highest caliber of education and training for young artists in the community.

Arts & Culture

Thrive in Southern New Mexico

Funding to local impact partners as part of the organization's multi-year community plan focused on achieving outcomes in the four specific areas determined to be essential in improving people's lives and strengthening our community: 1)…

Philanthropy

Humane Society of Taos Inc

Stray Hearts is a no-kill animal shelter and adoption facility providing humane care and shelter for more than 1,500 surrendered, abandoned and abused companion animals per year.

Animals

Unm Rainforest Innovations

Supporting the university of new mexico as the source of innovation management, patent prosecution and licensing of technologies developed at the university of new mexico.

Education

Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals

Santa Fe Concert Association

Performance santa fe (psf) is dedicated to support performing arts by bringing world-class performing artists to santa fe and providing excellent arts education to the youth in the community.

—

The Santa Fe Opera

To foster and enrich an understanding and appreciation of the operatic art form.

Arts & Culture

New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks

Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.

—

New Mexico Broadcasters Association

Education

Feed New Mexico Kids Inc

Feed New Mexico Kids, Inc. is on a mission to eradicate childhood hunger in New Mexico. Through donations of nutritious stackable food items that a child of the age of five years old and up may open and eat on the spot. We aim to provide…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Syracuse University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/48

the rest of the field

10%

970/9,592

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

47/47

Grantees still filing

43/47

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$630,963Education$188,770Environment$171,803Food & Nutrition$115,000Arts & Culture$111,500Animals$65,500Human Services$62,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM44× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune · Pnm Resources Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory · New Mexico Community Foundation · The Maloof Foundation · Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FREDERICK H LEONHARDT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CRESTONE EAGLE COMMUNITY MEDIA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 8.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 824685970 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CRESTONE EAGLE COMMUNITY MEDIA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 39% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Frederick H Leonhardt?

Find your warmest path to The Frederick H Leonhardt through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FREDERICK H LEONHARDT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frederick H Leonhardt?

More from the funding graph

THE FREDERICK H LEONHARDT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frederick H Leonhardt?

More from the funding graph