Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fred and Carolyn Keefe Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$18kEducation$13kScience & Tech$10kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$4k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$230k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ready for Rescue$4,000
Bridge Over Troubled Water$4,000
Tutoring Plus of Cambridge$4,000
Tutoring Plus of Cambridge$2,000
Liberty Humane Society$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Tutoring Plus of Cambridge: $5k → 8%Bridge Over Troubled Water: $4k → 16%Ready for Rescue: $5k → 17%Liberty Humane Society: $2k → 7%Tutoring Plus of Cambridge: $4k → 8%Boston Youth Wrestling: $5k → 16%Ready for Rescue: $4k → 17%Tutoring Plus of Cambridge: $2k → 8%Tutoring Plus of Cambridge: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TUTORING PLUS OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $13,000 · EducationTUTORING PLUS OF CAMBRIDGE INCPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $9,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeREADY FOR RESCUE: $9,000 · AnimalsREADY FOR RESCUELiberty Humane Society Inc: $9,000 · AnimalsLiberty Humane Society IncBEAT THE STREETS NEW ENGLAND INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBEAT THE ST…BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $4,000 · HealthBRIDGE OV…
Education$22,500Animals$18,000Youth Development$5,000Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTUTORING PLUS OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $13,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADY FOR RESCUE: $9,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLiberty Humane Society Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS NEW ENGLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fred and Carolyn Keefe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fred and Carolyn Keefe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc: 32% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred and Carolyn Keefe’s filings →

More from the funding graph