Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frank Varischetti Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$181k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MEducation$825kPublic Safety & Disaster$142kPublic Benefit$100kYouth Development$70kHuman Services$56kReligion$37kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $168k
$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROCKWAY VOLUNTEER HOSE COMPANY$45,093
BC3 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$30,000
RIDGWAY YMCA$25,000
ANAWIM MINISTRIES$25,000
BROCKWAY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$22,882
FLYING DOVE RANCH$20,000
GUARDIAN ANGEL CENTER$4,000
RIDGWAY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
DUBOIS JEFFERSON SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,000
THE BEECHWOODS PREBYTERIAN CHURCH$500
THE BROCKWAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$500
BROCKPORT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$500
ST TOBIAS CATHOLIC CHURCH$500
MOORHEAD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$500
MUNDERF UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUARDIAN ANGELs CENTER: $10k → 10%GUARDIAN ANGEL CENTER: $7k → 10%GUARDIAN ANGEL CENTER: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 31 repeat orgs$376k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
21

Total granted

$2.2M
$350k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
+13%

Still filing today

23%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc
    3× · 2018–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +562%
  • BE
    BC3 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $224k
  • UO
    UNIVERSTIY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k

Funded once

  • DC
    DUBOIS CENTRAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $170k
  • BS
    BROCKWAY SCHOOL COMM ED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • SR
    STEVENSVILLE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

—
2
Duncannon Fire Company No 1 Inc

Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services

—
3
Duboistown Fire Department

Fire, rescue and ems services

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Brookville Hospital

To provide you with exceptional care through our community-based health system while maintaining a reverence for life. our vision is to be the integrated health system of choice through excellent quality service and outcomes. value…

Health
5
Central Pennsylvania Clinic- a Medical Home for Special Children & Adults

Diagnosis and treatment of, and providing primary and subspecialty care for special children and adults with genetic diseases.

Health
6
Dubois Volunteer Fire Depart Inc

To provide township fire protection.

—
7
Hopewell Fire Department

Protecting hopewell from fires.

—
8
Bloomsburg Volunteer Ambulance Association

Community ambulance service serving residents in the greater bloomsburg, pennsylvania area

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Clearfield Volunteer Fire Department

The protection, preservation of life and property during emergencies as may occur in the Borough of Clearfield and surrounding communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
11
DuBois Regional Medical Center

To provide the patient with exceptional care through our community-based health system while maintaining a reverence for life. it's the vision of the system to be the integrated health system of choice through excellent quality, service…

Health
12
Tidioute Volunteer Fire Department

The Tidioute Volunteer Fire Department provides both fire and ambulance response services in the area of Tidioute, Pennsylvania.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is We Care for Kids; the most unlike its peers is Mengle Memorial Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BC3 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $224,000 · OtherBC3 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONUNIVERSTIY OF PITTSBURGH: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSTIY OF PITTSBURGHDUBOIS CENTRAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $170,000 · OtherDUBOIS CENTRAL CATHOLIC SCHOOLBROCKWAY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $130,541 · OtherBROCKWAY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTBrockway Volunteer Hose Company: $106,603 · OtherBrockway Volunteer Hose CompanyCITY OF DUBOIS: $100,000 · OtherCITY OF DUBOISIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherRIDGWAY YMCA: $50,000 · Other+39 more: $311,565 · Other+39 morePenn Highlands Healthcare Inc: $1,191,000 · HealthPenn Highlands Healthcare Inc+2 more: $9,000 · HealthFLYING DOVE RANCH INC: $31,858 · Youth DevelopmentWE CARE FOR KIDS: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentGUARDIAN ANGEL CENTER INC: $20,600 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 · EducationMengle Memorial Library: $1,900 · Education
Other$1,352,709Health$1,200,000Youth Development$34,358Human Services$20,600Education$6,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPenn Highlands Healthcare Inc: $1,191,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBrockway Volunteer Hose Company: $106,603 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetFLYING DOVE RANCH INC: $31,858 over 2y, 29% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGEL CENTER INC: $20,600 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF DUBOIS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUBOIS AREA FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMengle Memorial Library: $1,900 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBROCKWAY OLD FASHIONED 4TH OF JULY INC: $1,600 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brockway Volunteer Hose Company ↗
  • Who funds FLYING DOVE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN ANGEL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF DUBOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds DUBOIS AREA FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WE CARE FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Mengle Memorial Library ↗
  • Who funds BROCKWAY OLD FASHIONED 4TH OF JULY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Glenn & Ruth Mengle Foundation TrustPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Glenn & Ruth Mengle Foundation Trust · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · Dubois Area United Way · Gray Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frank Varischetti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frank Varischetti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank Varischetti’s filings →

    More from the funding graph