Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frances and Peter Robotti Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$548kReligion$259kHuman Services$137kAnimals$38kEducation$18kRecreation & Sports$10kEnvironment$5kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDAZIONE FRANCESCA E PIETRO ROBOTTI D' ITALIA STUDIO LEGALE VERNETTI$60,000
CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM$30,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW YORK$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRIENDS OF OLLIE CAT RESCUE$5,000
ANGELS OF LONG ISLAND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 48% of grant dollars ($497k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 52% that went abroad ($548k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%BOOK FAIRIES INC: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 52% of all-years giving ($548k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Italy$548k · 8 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$965k · 5 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$965k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
-1%

Still filing today

20%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsEnvironmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FONDAZIONE FRANCESCA E PIETRO ROBOTTI D' ITALIA STUDIO LEGALE VERNETTI
    8× · 2017–2024 · $548k
  • CS
    CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $259k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW YORK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $120k

Funded once

  • CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -1%
  • COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -40%
  • CL
    CONCERNED LONG ISLAND MOUNTAIN BICYCLISTS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The North Shore Land Alliance Inc

To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.

Environment
2
Lia Foundation Inc

(see schedule o)the lia foundation aims to implement programs, hold events, and conduct research that focus on areas critical to long island's economic development, including:- supporting small businesses- protecting long island's most…

Community Improvement
3
Community Health Action of Staten Island Inc

Community health action of staten island' drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers.

Unclassified
4
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
5
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
6
Peace Islands Institute New York Inc
Religion
7
Friends for Animal Rescue Ny Inc

Friends for animal rescue ny, inc. is a nonprofit organization that furthers the interest of animals in the new york state area and improves their quality of life by supporting medical care, enrichment activities, training and…

Animals
8
Adoption S T a R Inc

Adoption s.t.a.r., inc. (support, training, advocacy & resources), a new york state authorized non-profit adoption agency, is a compassionate and unique agency. the agency takes a strong stand in favor of adoption education and believes no…

Human Services
9
Long Island Association Inc

Lia is a business membership group that supports economic development on long island.

—
10
Feline Rescue of Staten Island Inc

Homeless felines and ultimately place them in a proper living situation in the hopes of avoiding new york city regulated euthanasia.

Animals
11
Star Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Book Fairies Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Star Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FONDAZIONE FRANCESCA E PIETRO ROBOTTI D' ITALIA STUDIO LEGALE VERNETTI: $548,206 · OtherFONDAZIONE FRANCESCA E PIETRO ROBOTTI D' ITALIA STUDIO LEGALE VERNETTICARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM: $258,603 · OtherCARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED AND INFIRMTHE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW YORK: $119,683 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW YORK+9 more: $55,950 · Other+9 moreALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $22,500 · AnimalsCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $10,000 · EducationCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $8,000 · EducationSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBOOK FAIRIES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesBRANCHES LONG ISLAND INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSAVE THE SOUND: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE STAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$982,442Animals$22,500Education$18,000Human Services$7,500Community Improvement$5,000Environment$5,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $22,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS OF LONG ISLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOOK FAIRIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC ↗
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS OF LONG ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANCHES LONG ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds THE STAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOK FAIRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frances and Peter Robotti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frances and Peter Robotti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frances and Peter Robotti’s filings →

More from the funding graph