Skip to content

· Public charity

The Forum for Urban Design

Connects and inspires new yorkers to design, build and care for a better city.

$375k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$325kCrime & Legal$250kRecreation & Sports$175kCivil Rights$125kReligion$125k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$828k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN SPACE ALLIANCE FOR N BROOKLYN$175,000
PITKIN AVENUE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT$100,000
SUNNYSIDE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOC$50,000
CAPITOL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTER FOR THIRD WORLD ORGANIZING: $125k → 10%Staten Island Urban Center Inc: $125k → 11%CCHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $125k → 13%JUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $125k → 17%PITKIN AVENUE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT: $100k → 20%CAPITOL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOC: $50k → 28%SUNNYSIDE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOC: $50k → 13%OPEN SPACE ALLIANCE FOR N BROOKLYN: $175k → 20%YOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUST: $125k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chinatown District Management Association Inc

The organization provides supplemental sanitation, streetscape improvement, visitor information and commercial support services to property owners, businesses and residents of an area established as a business improvement district.

Human Services
2
82nd Street District Management Association Inc

Improve quality of life and promote business growth by creating a cleaner, safer, and more inviting commercial district.

Community Improvement
3
Sutphin Boulevard District Management Association Inc

Provides economic revitalization, supplemental sanitation services and promotion for the area.

Community Improvement
4
Union Square Partnership District Management Association Inc

The organization provides supplemental sanitation, public safety, streetscape improvement, visitor information and commercial support services to property owners, businesses and residents of an area established as a business improvement…

Community Improvement
5
Oneida Square Arts District Association Inc

To enrich the lives of residents, artists, and businesses in utica's new york arts district by fostering creativity, inspiring community engagement, driving technological innovation, and celebrating a sustainable cultural vibrancy.

Arts & Culture
6
Chinatown Partnership Local Development Corp

To act in the public interest by conceiving, designing, implementing, managing, and facilitating economic development projects that benefit residents and organizations in chinatown in new york city as well as the general public visiting…

Community Improvement
7
Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc

CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…

Civil Rights
8
A Better Way Brooklyn Inc

A better way brooklyn, inc. is a new york not-for-profit corporation formed for the purposes of educating the public about transportation issues throughout new york city by promoting community awareness and concerns on construction and…

Public Benefit
9
West Village District Management Association Inc

To improve neighborhood conditions in the west village business improvement district and to enhance the cleanliness, safety and enjoyment of the district.

Community Improvement
10
Naturally Occurring Cultural Districts Ny Inc

NOCD-NY is a citywide alliance of cultural networks and community leaders that have joined together to revitalize New York City from the neighborhood up. NOCD-NY came together in 2010 in response to the vision, sustained needs, and…

Human Services
11
Park Slope Fifth Avenue District Management Association Inc

To promote the economic growth and well being of the businesses in the business improvement district through improving neighborhood conditions and the business environment.

Public Benefit
12
Sunset Park District Management Association Inc

To promote the economic growth and well being of the businesses in the business improvement district through improving neighborhood conditions and the environment.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chhaya Community Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Center for Third World Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STATEN ISLAND URBAN CENTER INC: $125,000 · Community ImprovementSTATEN ISLAND URBAN CENTER INCPITKIN AVENUE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementPITKIN AVENUE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT AS…SUNNYSIDE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIO: $50,000 · Community ImprovementSUNNYSIDE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCI…CAPITOL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementCAPITOL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIAT…JUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $125,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE INNOVATION INCCHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $125,000 · Crime & LegalCHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT…OPEN SPACE ALLIANCE FOR NORTH BROOKLYN INC: $175,000 · EnvironmentOPEN SPACE ALLIANCE…YOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $125,000 · OtherYOUTH MINISTRI…Center for Third World Organizing: $125,000 · InternationalCenter for Thi…
Community Improvement$325,000Crime & Legal$250,000Environment$175,000Other$125,000International$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN SPACE ALLIANCE FOR NORTH BROOKLYN INC: $175,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing: $125,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $125,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSTATEN ISLAND URBAN CENTER INC: $125,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetPITKIN AVENUE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSUNNYSIDE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIO: $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCAPITOL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

City Parks Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: City Parks Foundation Inc · New York Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Forum for Urban Design funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Forum for Urban Design. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forum for Urban Design’s filings →

    More from the funding graph