Skip to content
The Fischer-Ritchey Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Fischer-Ritchey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$40kArts & Culture$11kCrime & Legal$10kHuman Services$3kReligion$1kCivil Rights$550International$440Health$400Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CCAE Theatricals$15,040
Empower Me Up$15,000
Moonlight Cultural Foundation$3,250
Jean Will Presents$2,000
Panorama Teen Family Resource$2,000
Individual grant recipient$550
Individual grant recipient$500
Make-a-wish-Foundation$500
Individual grant recipient$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jameson Animal Rescue: $150 → 9%The Flourish Collective: $250 → 9%Make-a-wish-Foundation: $500 → 11%Children's Hospital of LA: $100 → 14%Autism Speaks: $300 → 17%Heifer International: $140 → 17%World Health Organization: $300 → 14%Napa Community Animal Rescue: $150 → 9%California State University San Mar: $20k → 11%ACLU: $300 → 17%California State University San Mar: $11k → 11%California State University San Mar: $5k → 11%CCAE Theatricals: $15k → 11%California State University San Mar: $2k → 11%CCAE Theatricals: $9k → 11%California State University San Mar: $1k → 11%Empower Me Up: $15k → 11%Empower Me Up: $10k → 11%Navy Ship Fund for Disadvantage Mil: $1k → 11%Navy Ship Fund for Disadvantage Mil: $1k → 11%Moonlight Cultural Foundation: $3k → 11%Current Wisdom: $300 → 11%Jean Will Presents: $2k → 11%Fresh Glass Productions: $1k → 11%Jean Will Presents: $500 → 11%Escondido Choral Arts Foundation: $500 → 11%Trinity Episcopal Church: $500 → 11%Emmanual Faith Church: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 7 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +117% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$95k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+11%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalPublic BenefitCivil RightsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    California State University San Mar
    5× · 2019–2024 · $39k
  • EM
    EMPOWER ME UP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • CT
    CCAE THEATRICALS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $24k

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO MUSIC SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • EC
    ESCONDIDO CHORAL ARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Encanto Arts
Arts & Culture
2
Connecting Through the Arts and Edu
—
3
Tao of Tomorrow

Nonprofit empowering leadership, culture

Public Benefit
4
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
5
The Center for International Theatre Development
Arts & Culture
6
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
7
Ensemble Shakespeare Theater

Presenting works of Shakespeare and other theater artists to the public.

Arts & Culture
8
The Cat Collaborative
Human Services
9
Art Empowerment for Life
—
10
Artronika

ARTRONIKA is a collective of Los Angeles based artists that produce immersive arts programming showcasing an array of South Asian talent and culture. Through innovative and inclusive events, we reimagine traditional music, art, and…

—
11
Uprising Theater
Arts & Culture
12
Orange County Childrens Theatre

OCCT provides a positive learning experience for children age 5-19 and their families in the many aspects of the performing arts.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moonlight Cultural Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Current Wisdom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

California State University San Mar: $38,718 · OtherCalifornia State University San MarNavy Ship Fund for Disadvantage Mil: $2,000 · Other+15 more: $7,090 · Other+15 moreCCAE THEATRICALS INC: $24,240 · Arts & CultureCCAE THEATRICALS INCMOONLIGHT CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $3,250 · Arts & CultureMOONLIGHT CULTURAL FOUNDATIONJEAN WILL PRESENTS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureJEAN WILL PRESENTS+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureEMPOWER ME UP: $25,000 · Crime & LegalEMPOWER ME UPPANORAMA TEEN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,200 · Public BenefitAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $300 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $100 · HealthFLOURISH COLLECTIVE: $250 · Civil RightsNAPA COMMUNITY ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM: $150 · Animals
Other$47,808Arts & Culture$30,490Crime & Legal$25,000Public Benefit$2,200Health$400Civil Rights$250Animals$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMPOWER ME UP: $25,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetCCAE THEATRICALS INC: $24,240 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEAN WILL PRESENTS: $2,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPANORAMA TEEN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,200 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetESCONDIDO CHORAL ARTS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCURRENT WISDOM: $300 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPA COMMUNITY ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPOWER ME UP ↗
  • Who funds CCAE THEATRICALS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOONLIGHT CULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEAN WILL PRESENTS ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA TEEN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ESCONDIDO CHORAL ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CURRENT WISDOM ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds FLOURISH COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds NAPA COMMUNITY ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charita…
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fischer-Ritchey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fischer-Ritchey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Fischer-Ritchey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Fischer-Ritchey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fischer-Ritchey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home