Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Feinberg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$510kInternational$367kEducation$110kYouth Development$80kCivil Rights$43kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND$25,000
GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
ORBIS INTERNATIONAL$15,000
OPERATION SMILE$15,000
SOLVING KIDS CANCER$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
COALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING$5,000
COVENANT HOUSE$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CONNECTICUT$5,000
UNICEF$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREENWICH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Feinberg Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Feinberg Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$30k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +52%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +60%
  • KS
    KING SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $110k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • WI
    WONDERWORK INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
2
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
6
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
11
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERATION SMILE INC: $135,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INCCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $100,000 · InternationalCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILD…Save The Children Federation Inc: $75,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncInternational Rescue Committee INC: $72,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $150,000 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITALSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC: $95,000 · HealthSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH …ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $135,000 · OtherORBIS INTERNATIONALRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CONNECTICUT: $50,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE…WONDERWORK INC: $20,000 · OtherWONDERWORK INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherKING SCHOOL INC: $110,000 · EducationKING SCHOO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING: $43,000 · Crime & LegalCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,000 · Human Services
International$387,000Health$290,000Other$220,000Education$110,000Youth Development$80,000Crime & Legal$43,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $150,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $135,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKING SCHOOL INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $100,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC: $95,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $80,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $75,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $72,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING: $43,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds KING SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF ↗
  • Who funds SOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Feinberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Feinberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich: 7% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Feinberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Feinberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Feinberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph