Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Farrah Fawcett Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$354k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.1MPhilanthropy$786kEducation$35kScience & Tech$20k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $273k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAND UP TO CANCER$145,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$127,500
KINDRED BOX INC$20,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$12,000
KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$10,000
INTERNATIONAL ANAL NEOPLASIA SOCIETY$10,000
HPV AND ANAL CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
ANTI CANCER LIFESTYLE FOUNDATION$9,500
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KINDRED BOX INC: $20k → 14%KINDRED BOX INC: $10k → 14%KINDRED BOX INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ND
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 13 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$2.1M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+123%

Still filing today

46%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +32%
  • AH
    ALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2022 · $57k · revenue +156%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    4× · 2020–2024 · $49k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +123%
  • GM
    George Mark Childrens Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +54%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
10
Aveni Foundation

The aveni foundation is committed to expediting development of gene-targeted therapies for metastatic cancers and other unmet medical needs.

Health
11
Gastric Cancer Foundation

The gastric cancer foundation helps patients to face their diagnosis with reliable information, tools to navigate the journey, and a compassionate community that truly understands. the foundation funds research initiatives that contribute…

Health
12
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Altru Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Anticancer Lifestyle Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STAND UP TO CANCER: $997,771 · PhilanthropySTAND UP TO CANCERENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $785,773 · PhilanthropyENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATIONAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $458,750 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $87,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISVANDERBILT - INGRAM CANCER CENTER: $80,000 · OtherVANDERBILT - INGRAM CANCER CENTERKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $69,000 · OtherKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTEAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $67,000 · OtherAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCUS DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM: $65,000 · OtherUS DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEMALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATION: $57,000 · OtherALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $45,000 · Other+3 more: $32,397 · OtherDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $49,000 · HealthTHE HPV AND ANAL CANCER FOUNDATION: $36,000 · HealthGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $10,000 · HealthTHE ANTICANCER LIFESTYLE FOUNDATION: $9,500 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthKindred Box Inc: $40,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$1,783,544Other$961,147Health$154,750Human Services$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTAND UP TO CANCER: $997,771 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $785,773 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $67,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $49,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKindred Box Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE HPV AND ANAL CANCER FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANTICANCER LIFESTYLE FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗
  • Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds Kindred Box Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HPV AND ANAL CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds George Mark Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTICANCER LIFESTYLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Farrah Fawcett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Farrah Fawcett Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Farrah Fawcett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Farrah Fawcett’s filings →

More from the funding graph