Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

The Family Garden

Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2017
1
Grants FY2017
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Family Garden’s FY2017 grant dollars went to The Longmont Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2017
$1,703
Largest grant, FY2017
$1,703
States reached, FY2017
1
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2017.

LONGMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,703

Compare The Family Garden with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Family Garden?

Find your warmest path to The Family Garden through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Family Garden

How much does The Family Garden give?
The Family Garden reported 1 grants totaling $1,703 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does The Family Garden fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Does The Family Garden accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is The Family Garden based?
The Family Garden is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph