Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ethel K Toor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$57kRecreation & Sports$26kPhilanthropy$21kHuman Services$19kReligion$12kHealth$8kArts & Culture$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,300
Median grant
6
States reached
$632k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A'S ACES$9,000
NEWMAN SCHOOL$6,300
PATRICIA TROST FRIEDLER FOUNDATION$4,100
CAMEL CLUB INC$3,300
LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC$2,500
TEMPLE KOL EMETH LEGACY FUND$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SHOWER POWER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
OK
LA
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 14 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$181k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-6%

Still filing today

29%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NEWMAN SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $58k
  • AA
    A'S ACES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k
  • PT
    PATRICIA TROST FRIEDLER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $25k

Funded once

  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -6%
  • TK
    TEMPLE KOL EMETH LTD
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • TU
    TULANE UNIVERSITY EARLY PSYCHOSIS
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Young People's Project Inc

The young people's project uses math literacy work to develop the abilities of elementary through high school students to succeed in school and in life.

Education
2
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
3
Street Law Inc

To develop classroom and community programs to educate young people about the law and government.

Community Improvement
4
Family Planning Association of Maine Inc

To ensure that all maine people have access to high-quality, affordable reproductive health care, comprehensive sexual health education, and the right to control their reproductive lives.

Health
5
New York Institute for Special Education

The mission of the new york institute for special education is to provide quality educational programs and support to students and families in a safe caring environment to awaken and inspire student curiosity, lifelong learning and…

Education
6
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
7
Multicultural Career Intern Program

The mission of mcip and its public school affiliate, chec, is to strive to become a model professional learning community that respects and responds to the diverse needs of our underserved students by preparing them for the acasemic rigors…

—
8
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
9
The Young Women's Project

Ywp builds the leadership and power of young people so that they can transform dc institutions to expand rights and opportunities for dc youth. ywp programs engage youth on three levels - as peer educators, advocates, and employees - and…

Education
10
Wildcat Service Corporation

Our mission is to create opportunities for individuals impacted by the criminal legal system.

Employment
11
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
12
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Liberation Programs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Walton High School Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWMAN SCHOOL: $57,800 · OtherNEWMAN SCHOOLA'S ACES: $34,500 · OtherA'S ACESPATRICIA TROST FRIEDLER FOUNDATION: $25,100 · OtherPATRICIA TROST FRIEDLER FOUNDATIONHARBOUR HOUSES OF JACKSON MS: $15,000 · OtherHARBOUR HOUSES OF JACKSON MSIndividual grant recipient: $13,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE KOL EMETH LEGACY FUND: $11,900 · OtherTEMPLE KOL EMETH LEGACY FUND+15 more: $19,200 · Other+15 moreTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSHOWER POWER INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesCAMEL CLUB INC: $5,300 · HealthLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $2,500 · HealthMISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationMETAIRIE PARK COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $100 · EducationThe Cara Program: $500 · Employment
Other$177,300Human Services$9,500Health$7,800Education$1,100Employment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMEL CLUB INC: $5,300 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOWER POWER INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING UP KNOWING: $2,200 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cara Program: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETAIRIE PARK COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMEL CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOWER POWER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds WALTON HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING UP KNOWING ↗
  • Who funds MISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds METAIRIE PARK COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ethel K Toor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ethel K Toor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ethel K Toor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph