· Private foundation
The Escobar Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $1,075 |
| CANTERBURY YOUTH VOICES | $1,000 |
| SANTA'S WORKSHOP | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CHICKASHA LIBRARY DPARTO | $1,000 |
| GRADY COUNTY FAIR BOARD | $750 |
| KUCO | $500 |
| CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN GRADY CO | $500 |
| CHICKASHA ANIMAL RESCUE TRANSPORTAT | $500 |
| DAVIS WALDORF PERFORMING ARTS USAO | $500 |
| PETS WITHOUT PARENTS | $500 |
| OKC ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $500 |
| OETA FOUNDATION | $500 |
| CHICKASHA AREA ARTS COUNCIL | $500 |
| SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCanterbury Voices Inc7× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +59%
- PWPETS WITHOUT PARENTS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +76%
- OZOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY6× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +175%
Funded once
- CPCHICKASHA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +61%
- PSPIONEER SCHOOL GRADY CO OKone grant, 2019 · $1k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue -116%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Reduce hunger in pets by providing free pet food and pet services to low income pet owners enabling them to keep their companion animal(s) with them. this includes providing routine vaccinations, spaying/neutering, pet supplies and shelter…
The Mission Statement for the Okmulgee County Humane Society is to enrich the lives of dogs and cats and provide support to the people who love them when in need - strengthen the overall human-animal bond.
Providing advocacy and education to purchasers, producers, network of food system support orgainzations and the community at large around systems based solutions for local food procurement
To provide an animal shelter, adoption services, and spay/neuter services to pontotoc county.
Oklahoma contemporary arts center encourages artistic expression in all its forms through education,exhibitions, and performance.
Our purpose is to restore and preserve the historic Okla Theatre, a cherished landmark that holds deep cultural and historical significance for our town. Through this restoration, we aim to honor our communitys heritage, foster local…
The oklahoma animal care foundation is committed to raising funds to improve the health and welfare of animals in oklahoma through education, public service and disaster response activities. our purpose is to educate the public about…
The Conservation Coalition of Oklahoma CCO is a nonpartisan 501c4 organization representing common-sense conservation policy in Oklahoma. Partnering with its 501c3 members, CCO advocates for science-based legislation protecting water,…
To provide a wide spectrum of high quality theatrical entertainment to a broad audience in Enid and the surrounding communities, and to provide a setting for nonprofessional actors, directors, designers, and technicians to learn and…
Support the oklahoma city community foundation by supporting the oklahoma philharmonic.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Zoological Society and the most unlike its peers is Pets Without Parents Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Canterbury Voices Inc ↗
- Who funds PETS WITHOUT PARENTS INC ↗
- Who funds SKYLINE URBAN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHICKASHA SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds CHICKASHA AREA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CHICKASHA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Minco Senior Citizen Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN NEVADA CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Escobar Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Canterbury Voices Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.