Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Erwin and Linda Arends Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$177kFood & Nutrition$38kRecreation & Sports$30kReligion$25kHuman Services$22kArts & Culture$21kYouth Development$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$104k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI$6,300
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$6,000
MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY$5,000
FIVE CITIES BAROQUE FOUNDATION$4,000
FIVE CITIES BAROQUE FOUNDATION$3,000
MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY$3,000
RICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI$2,000
CHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$2,000
SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA GUILD OF DECATUR$1,125
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME$1,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
UNITED WAY$700
DOVE INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 19%SERTOMA: $250 → 15%CHADDOCK CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME: $3k → 19%CHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 19%CHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 19%CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 19%CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 19%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MO
VA
AR
DC
HI
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 28 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
31

Total granted

$298k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+7%

Still filing today

68%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DP
    DECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +16%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +49%
  • NC
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND
    7× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • DP
    DECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • RC
    RICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Decatur Memorial Hospital

Decatur memorial hospital (dmh) serves the healthcare needs of the people of central illinois through operation of a 280-bed acute care hospital and related facilities providing comprehensive inpatient, outpatient and physician services.

Health
2
Decatur Memorial Foundation

The foundation's mission is to support and benefit decatur memorial hospital (a 280-bed acute care hospital and related facilities providing comprehensive inpatient, outpatient and physician service). it does this by conducting fund…

Health
3
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
4
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
5
Decatur County Community Foundation Inc

The foundation encourages, prudently manages and distributes charitable contributions to improve the quality of life of decatur county residents, now and in the future.

Philanthropy
6
Decatur Area Senior Citizens Council Inc

Facility providing services and wellness for elderly in decatur and macon county, illinois

—
7
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
8
Decatur Cooperative Ministry Inc

Decatur cooperative ministry helps families facing homelessness settle into safe, stable homes and build healthy lives filled with peace, hope and opportunity.

—
9
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
10
Dekalb County Community Foundation

Our purpose is to serve donors in achieving their philanthropic objectives, to create and build a lasting source of revenue to benefit the residents of our community, and to provide leadership and resources in addressing community needs.

Philanthropy
11
Decatur Postal Credit Union

We are a credit union serving our members with a place for loans and a place to save their money.

—
12
Decatur County United Fund Inc

To support social services in decatur county.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Decatur and Mid Il; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $75,700 · EducationMILLIKIN UNIVERSITYDECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $40,239 · EducationDECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $30,400 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation+1 more: $1,396 · EducationNORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND: $26,200 · OtherNORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUNDRICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $16,300 · OtherRICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $15,150 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSYMPHONY ORCHESTRA GUILD OF DECATUR: $7,780 · OtherSYMPHONY ORCHESTRA GUILD OF DECATURFIVE CITIES BAROQUE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherFIVE CITIES BAROQUE FOUNDATIONDECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5,000 · OtherGARRETT EVANGELICAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $5,000 · OtherRICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5,000 · Other+38 more: $36,115 · Other+38 moreDECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · Recreation & SportsDECATUR P…CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL: $11,500 · Human ServicesCHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN INN: $8,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS: $500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $250 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ILLINOIS: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMACON RESOURCES INC: $1,000 · HealthMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $800 · Health
Education$147,735Other$123,545Recreation & Sports$29,000Human Services$20,750Food & Nutrition$8,750Arts & Culture$3,000Health$2,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $75,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $40,239 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $30,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND: $26,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $16,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN INN: $8,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSYMPHONY ORCHESTRA GUILD OF DECATUR: $7,780 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ILLINOIS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDECATUR PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DECATUR AND MID IL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,396 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACON COUNTY CASA: $1,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDECATUR AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMACON RESOURCES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDECATUR AND MACON COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBABY TALK INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSERTOMA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN INN ↗
  • Who funds CHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA GUILD OF DECATUR ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DECATUR AND MID IL ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MACON COUNTY CASA ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MACON RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR AND MACON COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Macon CountyIL42.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Macon County · Andreas Foundation · Amherst F Hardy Foundation · James Millikin Trust A · John Ullrich Foundation Trust Busey Trust Co - Trustee · Ts & Juanita Ballance Foundation · United Way of Decatur and Mid Il · Henry M Staley Declaration of Charit Tr D/B/A Staley Family Foundation · Edward Whinnery Trust · Howard G Buffett Foundation · Michael D Andreas Foundation · Pilling Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Erwin and Linda Arends Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Erwin and Linda Arends Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Erwin and Linda Arends Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Erwin and Linda Arends Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Erwin and Linda Arends’ filings →

More from the funding graph